Jump to content


will this get me into trouble?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 rog

rog

    Little Lebowski Urban Achiever

  • Members
  • 1,870 posts

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:49 PM

PokerStars 0.25/0.50 Hold'em (5 handed) converterPreflop: Rog is Button with [5s], [5h]. UTG calls, MP calls, Rog raises, SB calls, BB calls, UTG calls, MP calls.Flop: (10 SB) [6d], [Ac], [7d] (5 players)SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, MP checks, Rog bets, SB folds, BB calls, UTG folds, MP folds.Turn: (6 BB) [8s] (2 players)BB checks, Rog bets, BB folds.Final Pot: 7 BBResults in white below: No showdown. Rog wins 7 BB.
Rog

"I got it, I got it. Last words: I dig music! . . . I'M ON DRUGS!"

#2 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:51 PM

Yes.55 and 66 should only be raised there if the blinds are tight.55 is very marginaly
back for kramit

#3 cdddc75

cdddc75

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Portland

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:52 PM

wrto4556 said:

Yes.55 and 66 should only be raised there if the blinds are tight.55 is very marginaly
Even five handed? I'm not a shorthanded expert, but I think I might raise any pair five handed.
"I'd root for Hellmuth against my Mother if I knew Phil was holding the Krablar." -- BigDMcGee

"Poker is 98% luck, I'm trying to make it 97.8% luck. " -- JFarrell20, deported village idiot

#4 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:56 PM

cdddc75 said:

wrto4556 said:

Yes.55 and 66 should only be raised there if the blinds are tight.55 is very marginaly
Even five handed? I'm not a shorthanded expert, but I think I might raise any pair five handed.
That will get you in trouble, too. 22-55 just aren't strong enough.
back for kramit

#5 obs

obs

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 276 posts
  • Location:3/6

Posted 20 April 2005 - 05:04 PM

At that level, many players play any A and will never fold any pair. I think most of the time you are behind here.

#6 rog

rog

    Little Lebowski Urban Achiever

  • Members
  • 1,870 posts

Posted 21 April 2005 - 06:42 AM

I'm okay with how I played it post flop at that table. When nobody raised the flop, I was pretty sure nobody had an A, and the table was very weak, so I felt there was a good enough chance I could push 2nd pair out.I know not to raise 55 in a ring pre-flop, and I'm still trying to find the right agression level for short-handed. How short would the table have to be for you to raise 55? Heads up raise it for sure? 3-handed?
Rog

"I got it, I got it. Last words: I dig music! . . . I'M ON DRUGS!"

#7 Absolute

Absolute

    The Greatest

  • Members
  • 3,459 posts

Posted 21 April 2005 - 06:51 AM

wrto4556 said:

cdddc75 said:

wrto4556 said:

Yes.55 and 66 should only be raised there if the blinds are tight.55 is very marginaly
Even five handed? I'm not a shorthanded expert, but I think I might raise any pair five handed.
That will get you in trouble, too. 22-55 just aren't strong enough.


#8 srblan

srblan

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 555 posts

Posted 21 April 2005 - 06:58 AM

I don't really see a problem with raising pocket 5s short-handed. You're in position, which improves the case. You've probably got the best hand, also. If it isn't good enough to raise short-handed, I don't see how it is good enough to play, since you are probably not going to get odds to flop a set. I say raise it, then chuck it if you encounter a lot of resistance and don't flop a set. I'm not saying raise it every time, or out of position, but I really don't see a problem with raising on the button, in fact, I'd be raising on the button with less than that pretty often.

#9 wrto4556

wrto4556

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,418 posts

Posted 21 April 2005 - 10:11 AM

srblan said:

since you are probably not going to get odds to flop a set. I say raise it, then chuck it if you encounter a lot of resistance and don't flop a set.
If you're not getting the odds to hit a set why would you raise. It's not for value. Limping is. You are getting 4-1 immediate odds to flop a set. With the implied odds shorthanded, that's more than enough.
back for kramit




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users