After about 11,700 hands my PP range from 71 times to 42 times, obv AA being the 42 (44 and 1010 being highest), and JJ being third at 61. Does this seem weird, I took stats a few years ago but forgot what little I learned. Is this in line with standard deviations and all that good stuff, or too small a sample?
0
Pocket Pairs And Frequency Of Them
Started by obizee, Jun 23 2007 09:09 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
obizee
-
- Members
- 654 posts
Poker Forum Groupie
- Gender:Male
- Location:Michigan
- Favorite Poker Game:NL HE
Posted 23 June 2007 - 09:09 PM
#2
total_con12
-
- Members
- 360 posts
Poker Forum Nut
- Gender:Male
- Location:Los Angeles
Posted 23 June 2007 - 09:28 PM
Way too small a sample in my opinion.
Piyah!
total_con12: pinch pinch?
Dealer: bighurt010 has high card Ace
Dealer: total_con12 has a pair of Threes
Dealer: Game #10910053155: total_con12 wins pot (2935) with a pair of Threes
bighurt010: thats just wrong
Funkert: that's not the way poker was meant to be no :<
Dealer: Game #10910069532: IanMklElf wins pot (450)
bighurt010: rookies
bighurt010: haha
psufans2 [observer]: PINCH PINCH OWNS U DONKEY
total_con12: if i don't play the krablar, i can't win with the krablar
total_con12: and if i can't win with the krablar, i can't dance
bighurt010: true true
total_con12: pinch pinch?
Dealer: bighurt010 has high card Ace
Dealer: total_con12 has a pair of Threes
Dealer: Game #10910053155: total_con12 wins pot (2935) with a pair of Threes
bighurt010: thats just wrong
Funkert: that's not the way poker was meant to be no :<
Dealer: Game #10910069532: IanMklElf wins pot (450)
bighurt010: rookies
bighurt010: haha
psufans2 [observer]: PINCH PINCH OWNS U DONKEY
total_con12: if i don't play the krablar, i can't win with the krablar
total_con12: and if i can't win with the krablar, i can't dance
bighurt010: true true
#3
KashousKlay
-
- Members
- 13 posts
Poker Forum Newbie
- Location:Indiana
Posted 23 June 2007 - 09:46 PM
QUOTE (obizee @ Saturday, June 23rd, 2007, 9:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
After about 11,700 hands my PP range from 71 times to 42 times, obv AA being the 42 (44 and 1010 being highest), and JJ being third at 61.
Why would you say obviously AA would be the least likely pocket pair to be dealt?
#4
timwakefield
-
- Members
- 13,883 posts
He fixes radios by thinking!
- Gender:Male
- Location:Boston
Posted 23 June 2007 - 10:33 PM
QUOTE (KashousKlay @ Saturday, June 23rd, 2007, 9:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why would you say obviously AA would be the least likely pocket pair to be dealt?
I think he just meant because it would be the unluckiest, so obviously that's what it was.
Way way too small a sample size to worry about deviations like that.
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Monday, February 20th, 2012, 1:13 PM)
Hitler was not motivated by hate.
Gervais: What do you worry about, that you've heard on the news?
Pilkington: I heard something about worms getting teeth.
Hitler was not motivated by hate.
Gervais: What do you worry about, that you've heard on the news?
Pilkington: I heard something about worms getting teeth.
#5
obizee
-
- Members
- 654 posts
Poker Forum Groupie
- Gender:Male
- Location:Michigan
- Favorite Poker Game:NL HE
Posted 24 June 2007 - 12:17 AM
I figured it was way too small of a sample size, I dont really care which pairs they were its just 42-71 seems a bit much. I was just saying obviously aces was the ones I get the least, because u would obviously like to get them the most.
But, I want to be clear this is not some Bad beat kinda thing of wah I dont get aces enough, it just seems like a wide range but I am no math expert-or even a novice really. I think the 4's and 10's have probably been a few too many and the range should be more in the 42-62(guessing).
But, I want to be clear this is not some Bad beat kinda thing of wah I dont get aces enough, it just seems like a wide range but I am no math expert-or even a novice really. I think the 4's and 10's have probably been a few too many and the range should be more in the 42-62(guessing).
#7
Actuary
-
- Members
- 19,026 posts
.
Posted 24 June 2007 - 03:51 AM
I'll give you some Standard Dev type answers in a bit...
It's almost for sure not too small of a sample.
It's almost for sure not too small of a sample.
#8
Actuary
-
- Members
- 19,026 posts
.
Posted 24 June 2007 - 04:00 AM
Exp Pair Freq : 52.9
Stnd Dev: 7.26
So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.
so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck
Stnd Dev: 7.26
So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.
so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck
#9
obizee
-
- Members
- 654 posts
Poker Forum Groupie
- Gender:Male
- Location:Michigan
- Favorite Poker Game:NL HE
Posted 24 June 2007 - 11:16 PM
QUOTE (Actuary @ Sunday, June 24th, 2007, 8:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Exp Pair Freq : 52.9
Stnd Dev: 7.26
So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.
so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck
Stnd Dev: 7.26
So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.
so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck
thx appreciate the crunching of numbers
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
