Pocket Pairs And Frequency Of Them

[obizee 0]

After about 11,700 hands my PP range from 71 times to 42 times, obv AA being the 42 (44 and 1010 being highest), and JJ being third at 61. Does this seem weird, I took stats a few years ago but forgot what little I learned. Is this in line with standard deviations and all that good stuff, or too small a sample?

[total_con12 0]

Way too small a sample in my opinion.

[KashousKlay 0]

After about 11,700 hands my PP range from 71 times to 42 times, obv AA being the 42 (44 and 1010 being highest), and JJ being third at 61.

Why would you say obviously AA would be the least likely pocket pair to be dealt?

[timwakefield 69]

Why would you say obviously AA would be the least likely pocket pair to be dealt?

I think he just meant because it would be the unluckiest, so obviously that's what it was. Way way too small a sample size to worry about deviations like that.

[obizee 0]

I figured it was way too small of a sample size, I dont really care which pairs they were its just 42-71 seems a bit much. I was just saying obviously aces was the ones I get the least, because u would obviously like to get them the most.But, I want to be clear this is not some Bad beat kinda thing of wah I dont get aces enough, it just seems like a wide range but I am no math expert-or even a novice really. I think the 4's and 10's have probably been a few too many and the range should be more in the 42-62(guessing).

[pragtyro 0]

Never mind

[Actuary 3]

I'll give you some Standard Dev type answers in a bit...It's almost for sure not too small of a sample.

[Actuary 3]

Exp Pair Freq : 52.9Stnd Dev: 7.26So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck

[obizee 0]

Exp Pair Freq : 52.9Stnd Dev: 7.26So you are within 2.5 and 1.5 on te hi and low range of pairs you've had.so there is no evdence that you have irregular luck

thx appreciate the crunching of numbers