Jump to content


What Range Of Hands Do I Need Here?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Lil_Hellmuth

Lil_Hellmuth

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 207 posts
  • Location:West Des Moines, IA
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 15 June 2007 - 06:59 AM

Playing 1/2 NL at my local B & M. It is now down to 5 handed and this is the last hand before the table breaks. I am in the BB. UTG+1 moves all in for 33.....and the button moves in for 98 dollars.
I had a strong feeling that the button was moving in to isolate.

However, what range of hands do you call with in the BB? Of course I would love to win the whole pot but I would still make a 66 dollar profit by winning the side pot.

Let me know what you think

#2 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:36 AM

QUOTE (Lil_Hellmuth @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 7:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Playing 1/2 NL at my local B & M. It is now down to 5 handed and this is the last hand before the table breaks. I am in the BB. UTG+1 moves all in for 33.....and the button moves in for 98 dollars.
I had a strong feeling that the button was moving in to isolate.

However, what range of hands do you call with in the BB? Of course I would love to win the whole pot but I would still make a 66 dollar profit by winning the side pot.

Let me know what you think


I really think your ranged is really limited here. There's a chance that these people are trying to compensate for the last hand of the night, but still... I think calling with mediocre hands in this spot would be a leak. I'm thinking QQ, KK, AA only in this spot. I'm pretty sure I'd lay down JJ and AK.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)

#3 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:37 AM

QUOTE (Lil_Hellmuth @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 6:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Playing 1/2 NL at my local B & M. It is now down to 5 handed and this is the last hand before the table breaks. I am in the BB. UTG+1 moves all in for 33.....and the button moves in for 98 dollars.
I had a strong feeling that the button was moving in to isolate.

However, what range of hands do you call with in the BB? Of course I would love to win the whole pot but I would still make a 66 dollar profit by winning the side pot.

Let me know what you think


Why get involved?
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#4 Acid_Knight

Acid_Knight

    I'm what's left. I'm what's right.

  • Members
  • 9,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas
  • Favorite Poker Game:You vs Me. Cagematch.

Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:44 AM

23o+

#5 Lil_Hellmuth

Lil_Hellmuth

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 207 posts
  • Location:West Des Moines, IA
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:04 AM

Well here is what happened. I looked down at QQ and made the call. No one turns the cards over and after the Kd spikes on the river....both guys do. BOTH SHOWING KJo. So I lose on a 2 out river card.

I am just wondering what my range to call here. This is not a result oriented question. Did I make the right decision by calling here, or should I of avoided it and laid it down.

#6 fckthis

fckthis

    mmmmmmm Alba

  • Members
  • 2,038 posts
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Long walks on gravel,<br />watching my 67year old neighbour undress,<br /><br />poker

Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:08 AM

QUOTE (Lil_Hellmuth @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 9:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well here is what happened. I looked down at QQ and made the call. No one turns the cards over and after the Kd spikes on the river....both guys do. BOTH SHOWING KJo. So I lose on a 2 out river card.

I am just wondering what my range to call here. This is not a result oriented question. Did I make the right decision by calling here, or should I of avoided it and laid it down.


Obviously call with QQ+, including AK. Ye you could dip into 1010 and JJ and probably still be +ev to make the call, but anything lower is playing tournment style poker at a cash game.

and BBFIDTS
Mike Matusow: want to play some o 8
Mike Matusow: 5001k
Ram Vaswani: you to good at 500 1k but i play you 1k 2k

#7 Frez

Frez

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,042 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sherwood Park, Alberta
  • Favorite Poker Game:HORSE. Home game donkaments

Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:14 AM

I would happily call with Jacks and up here, since I think they could make this move with any big ace or even KQ.

AK also, and likely AQs
Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things. (Robert Heinlein).

#8 Acid_Knight

Acid_Knight

    I'm what's left. I'm what's right.

  • Members
  • 9,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas
  • Favorite Poker Game:You vs Me. Cagematch.

Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:20 AM

QUOTE (Lil_Hellmuth @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 10:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am just wondering what my range to call here. This is not a result oriented question. Did I make the right decision by calling here, or should I of avoided it and laid it down.

You are obviously results oriented or you wouldn't have posted this since you made a call and were ahead of both players.

BBFIDTS

#9 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 09:39 AM

It was a good call in the long run, since QQ will beat two players with KJ 75% of the time. Like I said, I would generally call with QQ, KK, or AA in this situation. Unless I knew one of them was super tight, then I'd go with KK or AA only. Most of the time I'd laydown JJ and AK.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)

#10 profxavier9

profxavier9

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,084 posts
  • Location:Toronto
  • Interests:money
  • Favorite Poker Game:Acey Duecy

Posted 15 June 2007 - 11:38 AM

QUOTE (fckthis @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 9:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Obviously call with QQ+, including AK. Ye you could dip into 1010 and JJ and probably still be +ev to make the call, but anything lower is playing tournment style poker at a cash game.

and BBFIDTS



QUOTE (Frez @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 9:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would happily call with Jacks and up here, since I think they could make this move with any big ace or even KQ.

AK also, and likely AQs

i think you two might be playing a little too loose. Unless the guy is a maniac calling with 1010 or AQ is pretty much never good here .
..ok so what do i do now?..

stars nameMrPristine
full tilt - profxavier9

#11 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 15 June 2007 - 11:56 AM

QUOTE (profxavier9 @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 11:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i think you two might be playing a little too loose. Unless the guy is a maniac calling with 1010 or AQ is pretty much never good here .


Why get involved?
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#12 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 12:56 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why get involved?


You wouldn't get involved if you woke up with AA or KK in this spot? It'd be a missed opportunity.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)

#13 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:02 PM

QUOTE (Webslinger516 @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 12:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You wouldn't get involved if you woke up with AA or KK in this spot? It'd be a missed opportunity.


The table was breaking. I have a 100% chance of not winning my money back if I lose.

Pay attention to this, cause I saw a dude go from $850 to $66 in two hands just the other night again, and he had them racked and was leaving the table but decided to play "his last hand." First hand, he got sucked out on, then he steamed and said "one more hand." Second hand, he made an insane river bluff into trips that gave him action from the flop onward. From a few bills short of a grand to a tank of gas.

If you're leaving, if the table's breaking, put your chips on lockdown.
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#14 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:38 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 2:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If you're leaving, if the table's breaking, put your chips on lockdown.


That's cool. But in my opinion, if I have a chance to get my money in where i'm a huge favorite, I don't care if it causes me to have a losing session. My job is to get the most out of every opportunity. It doesn't matter if I'm in the middle of a long session or at the end of a long session; if I have a chance to get all my money in preflop with AA, I'll take it.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)

#15 Lil_Hellmuth

Lil_Hellmuth

    Poker Forum Regular

  • Members
  • 207 posts
  • Location:West Des Moines, IA
  • Interests:Poker

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:40 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 1:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The table was breaking. I have a 100% chance of not winning my money back if I lose.

Pay attention to this, cause I saw a dude go from $850 to $66 in two hands just the other night again, and he had them racked and was leaving the table but decided to play "his last hand." First hand, he got sucked out on, then he steamed and said "one more hand." Second hand, he made an insane river bluff into trips that gave him action from the flop onward. From a few bills short of a grand to a tank of gas.

If you're leaving, if the table's breaking, put your chips on lockdown.


I completely understand that. So you dump queens here?

Just so you know I bet that we play at the same card room if you play live. I am from Des Moines also. Actually live in Altoona.

#16 Frez

Frez

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,042 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sherwood Park, Alberta
  • Favorite Poker Game:HORSE. Home game donkaments

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:44 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 3:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The table was breaking. I have a 100% chance of not winning my money back if I lose.

Pay attention to this, cause I saw a dude go from $850 to $66 in two hands just the other night again, and he had them racked and was leaving the table but decided to play "his last hand." First hand, he got sucked out on, then he steamed and said "one more hand." Second hand, he made an insane river bluff into trips that gave him action from the flop onward. From a few bills short of a grand to a tank of gas.

If you're leaving, if the table's breaking, put your chips on lockdown.


How is this wrong? Let me count the ways:

1. Who cares if the table is breaking. It's all one big session until you die.

2. So you "pay attention" to one guy taking a bad beat, then steaming and you think it's suddenly the right play to start folding big hands. Here's a solution - don't steam after your bad beats!

3. The OP is not asking "should I play", but "how big of a hand do I need". If you're leaving "put your chips on lockdown" Seriously? Then the second you decide it's time to go home, get up and leave the table. Muck your aces and go home.

4. The situation was pretty clearly described, and the fact that everyone knows it's the last hand very likely means that people are going to play weak hands. QQ is a monster 5 handed - doublely so here.
Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things. (Robert Heinlein).

#17 Acid_Knight

Acid_Knight

    I'm what's left. I'm what's right.

  • Members
  • 9,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas
  • Favorite Poker Game:You vs Me. Cagematch.

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:47 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 2:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The table was breaking. I have a 100% chance of not winning my money back if I lose.

Pay attention to this, cause I saw a dude go from $850 to $66 in two hands just the other night again, and he had them racked and was leaving the table but decided to play "his last hand." First hand, he got sucked out on, then he steamed and said "one more hand." Second hand, he made an insane river bluff into trips that gave him action from the flop onward. From a few bills short of a grand to a tank of gas.

If you're leaving, if the table's breaking, put your chips on lockdown.

This does not apply.

If you're sitting at the table, you're there to play cards. If you're worried about "protecting your chips" becuase you're almost ready to leave, then just get up and go. If you're not willing to play a hand as you'd normally play it, then you shouldn't be at the table.

Going on tilt and donking off chips is his own fault. There's nothing wrong with getting sucked out on (or putting yourself in a position to do so) as long as you played the hand correctly.

Knowingly passing up what is likely a profitable situation (like the one in the OP) becuase you're ready to go or the game is ending is just 100% totally wrong.

If you're not willing to play cards, then get up from the table.

#18 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:48 PM

QUOTE (Frez @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 2:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How is this wrong? Let me count the ways:

1. Who cares if the table is breaking. It's all one big session until you die.

2. So you "pay attention" to one guy taking a bad beat, then steaming and you think it's suddenly the right play to start folding big hands. Here's a solution - don't steam after your bad beats!

3. The OP is not asking "should I play", but "how big of a hand do I need". If you're leaving "put your chips on lockdown" Seriously? Then the second you decide it's time to go home, get up and leave the table. Muck your aces and go home.

4. The situation was pretty clearly described, and the fact that everyone knows it's the last hand very likely means that people are going to play weak hands. QQ is a monster 5 handed - doublely so here.


Agreed on all 4 points. Your goal in NLHE Cash games is to make as many +EV decisions as possible.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)

#19 mtdesmoines

mtdesmoines

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 9,939 posts

Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:57 PM

QUOTE (Frez @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 1:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How is this wrong? Let me count the ways:

1. Who cares if the table is breaking. It's all one big session until you die.

2. So you "pay attention" to one guy taking a bad beat, then steaming and you think it's suddenly the right play to start folding big hands. Here's a solution - don't steam after your bad beats!

3. The OP is not asking "should I play", but "how big of a hand do I need". If you're leaving "put your chips on lockdown" Seriously? Then the second you decide it's time to go home, get up and leave the table. Muck your aces and go home.

4. The situation was pretty clearly described, and the fact that everyone knows it's the last hand very likely means that people are going to play weak hands. QQ is a monster 5 handed - doublely so here.



i feel assaulted
i was only half-serious
and only half-joking
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era

#20 Webslinger516

Webslinger516

    Poker Forum Nut

  • Members
  • 362 posts
  • Favorite Poker Game:No Limit Hold'em

Posted 15 June 2007 - 02:08 PM

QUOTE (mtdesmoines @ Friday, June 15th, 2007, 2:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i feel assaulted
i was only half-serious
and only half-joking


Ok whew. I just didn't want FCP readers to think it's a good thing to laydown AA preflop in this situation.
Redula Law Office (Workers Comp in California, shameless advertisement)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users