silicon 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 Last week I was playing in a club tournament. A player called another players river bet. The original bettor showed one of his hole cards (4s that gave him a pair), which was obviously enough to beat the caller as he mucked his cards. The original bettor then went to muck his cards.As this guy had raised a significant amount preflop I wondered what his other card was and asked him to show it. He claimed that since his one card on its own was enough to win the pot he was not obligated to show the other. I claimed that his bet had been called and the table was entitled to see his hole cards.Responses from Hoyle appreciated. Link to post Share on other sites
JadeTiger 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 Last week I was playing in a club tournament. A player called another players river bet. The original bettor showed one of his hole cards (4s that gave him a pair), which was obviously enough to beat the caller as he mucked his cards. The original bettor then went to muck his cards.As this guy had raised a significant amount preflop I wondered what his other card was and asked him to show it. He claimed that since his one card on its own was enough to win the pot he was not obligated to show the other. I claimed that his bet had been called and the table was entitled to see his hole cards.Responses from Hoyle appreciated.If a hand is called it is required to show both hole cards. If a player bets and everyone folds that player is allowed to show one, two or no cards at his discretion. Here is a link to prove the latter. http://www.cardplayer.com/magazine/article/15532 Link to post Share on other sites
RayPowers 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 THE SHOWDOWN 1. A player must show all cards in the hand face-up on the table to win any part of the pot.From Robert's Rules of PokerFound HereRay Link to post Share on other sites
PotDragon 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 It's not even a grey area. 1. A player must show all cards in the hand face-up on the table to win any part of the pot. http://cardplayer.com/rules_of_poker/general_rules Link to post Share on other sites
Royal_Tour 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 Thats what you get when you play in Clubs, or home games.No dealer to state rules. Link to post Share on other sites
fleung22 1 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 Agreed with all of the above.You have to win the showdown with TWO cards.I wonder if two hands go in the muck if that's a chop? Link to post Share on other sites
-HAL9000- 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 At The Bicycle and Commerce you have to show both cards no matter what, tourney's or cash games. Link to post Share on other sites
PotDragon 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 At The Bicycle and Commerce you have to show both cards no matter what, tourney's or cash games.A skilled dealer should ALWAYS require both cards be shown before awarding the pot.If they can remember while following their sports bets that is. Link to post Share on other sites
_Great_Dane_ 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 A skilled dealer should ALWAYS require both cards be shown before awarding the pot.There are not that many skilled dealers.If a player bets and everyone folds that player is allowed to show one, two or no cards at his discretion. Here is a link to prove the latter. http://www.cardplayer.com/magazine/article/15532 There's a "needling" rule used in all WSOP, WSOP circuit, and WPT tournaments that allows for a player to ask that the other card is shown if a winning player just shows one card when no one calls his bet.I haven't read the info on the above link, but the above link doesn't prove anything. Link to post Share on other sites
stevedar 0 Posted August 15, 2006 Share Posted August 15, 2006 Two cards must be shown however if the other guy mucks upon seeing one card then he wins since he's the only player with cards anyways...seems reasonable? I personally just hold onto my cards till they show both. Link to post Share on other sites
JeremyG 0 Posted August 16, 2006 Share Posted August 16, 2006 Exactly, the player mucked, the other player didn't have to show anything else.Which is why I always just call and then sit there until the other person shows BOTH his/her cards. If he shows one, I say, "and what's your kicker". You paid to see both cards. Don't muck until you do. Link to post Share on other sites
DCJ001 0 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 In Daniel's 01/23/07 blog: One thing I'm not a fan of, I believe it's a recent addition to rules at both the Bellagio and here, is the rule where if you show one card the dealer is obligated to show both of your cards. That is a terrible rule and interferes with the psychology of the game unnecessarily. http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-jour...&ucat=& Link to post Share on other sites
David_Nicoson 1 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 The bettor is slowing things down unnecessarily. Just show the ***** down.The caller doesn't have to muck until he sees both cards, but he did.You have a right to see the hand because of the threat of collusion. Don't abuse that privilege for information. Link to post Share on other sites
XXEddie 0 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 In Daniel's 01/23/07 blog:One thing I'm not a fan of, I believe it's a recent addition to rules at both the Bellagio and here, is the rule where if you show one card the dealer is obligated to show both of your cards. That is a terrible rule and interferes with the psychology of the game unnecessarily. http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-jour...&ucat=& this probably stem from all the idiots who thought the 'show one, show all' rule, meant this Link to post Share on other sites
terradawg 0 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 i think that daniel was referring to someone showing one card when uncalled. ex. player A bets, player B folds, player A shows one card intending to have some sort of effect on the other player, and then dealer shows the player B the other, previously unshown card. Link to post Share on other sites
ScottTK 0 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Do you have to show your cards when you call someone's bluff and they muck immediately then? Link to post Share on other sites
DCJ001 0 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 i think that daniel was referring to someone showing one card when uncalled. ex. player A bets, player B folds, player A shows one card intending to have some sort of effect on the other player, and then dealer shows the player B the other, previously unshown card.Yes.this probably stem from all the idiots who thought the 'show one, show all' rule, meant this http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...t&p=1338324 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now