116 replies to this topic

[Skeleton Jelly]

CaneBrain, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 8:21 AM, said:

Christianity places requirements on man like any other religion and those requirements are basically the same as the ones in Judaism except trade no pork ever for no meat on Friday.

That's Catholicism, not Christianity.

[CaneBrain]

Skeleton Jelly, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 11:23 AM, said:

That's Catholicism, not Christianity.

I mean Catholicism encompasses more Christians than any other sect, correct? Kinda hard to argue Catholicism is wildly different from Christianity.See, it's confusing and that is why blanket statements about "Christianity" are often wrong. Each little sect has its own rules. I mean I hear those unitarians let women be priests. They are all going to the lake of fire (a nice image of God's mercy if there ever was one).

[Skeleton Jelly]

CaneBrain, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 8:34 AM, said:

I mean Catholicism encompasses more Christians than any other sect, correct? Kinda hard to argue Catholicism is wildly different from Christianity.See, it's confusing and that is why blanket statements about "Christianity" are often wrong. Each little sect has its own rules. I mean I hear those unitarians let women be priests. They are all going to the lake of fire (a nice image of God's mercy if there ever was one).

I think Christianity means: Jesus died on the cross for your sins and was resurrected three days later and all you have to do is believe in him and you will go to heaven.All the different sects have different ideas about what you should do to be a "good" Christian or something like that, but they aren't deal breakers.I think. I never said Catholicism was wildly different from Christianity.

[vbnautilus]

SweetDee, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 7:33 AM, said:

That depends on what you see as smart. Are you a genius for having a ton of worldly knowledge and understanding but failing to recognize that which BG does, or is BG a genius for having a fair amount of worldly knowledge as well but fully grasping that which he cannot see? I'm certain that many "smart" people are going to feel and look incredibly stupid when the time comes.

Let me get this straight.... You are saying that smart actually means: having less knowledge and critical thinking skills than others but being more convinced of religious doctrines? While we're redefining things, why not just agree that "atheists" should refer to those people who believe in god?

[CaneBrain]

Skeleton Jelly, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 11:38 AM, said:

I think Christianity means: Jesus died on the cross for your sins and was resurrected three days later and all you have to do is believe in him and you will go to heaven.All the different sects have different ideas about what you should do to be a "good" Christian or something like that, but they aren't deal breakers.I think. I never said Catholicism was wildly different from Christianity.

I think over time what is considered a deal breaker has evolved to accomodate the wishes and desires of Christians which is probably the most damning evidence that religion is bullshit. Divorce is supposed to be a one way ticket to the lake of fire (I think) and yet in our "Christian Nation" we have a divorce rate of 52% (and that rate is higher in the so-called bible belt than it is in librul, god-less cities).

vbnautilus, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 11:53 AM, said:

Let me get this straight.... You are saying that smart actually means: having less knowledge and critical thinking skills than others but being more convinced of religious doctrines? While we're redefining things, why not just agree that "atheists" should refer to those people who believe in god?

It's the ultimate in results oriented thinking, imo.

[brvheart]

CaneBrain, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 10:34 AM, said:

I mean Catholicism encompasses more Christians than any other sect, correct? Kinda hard to argue Catholicism is wildly different from Christianity.See, it's confusing and that is why blanket statements about "Christianity" are often wrong. Each little sect has its own rules. I mean I hear those unitarians let women be priests. They are all going to the lake of fire (a nice image of God's mercy if there ever was one).

It would be better for your "rep" if you avoided this topic completely.

[CaneBrain]

brvheart, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:12 PM, said:

It would be better for your "rep" if you avoided this topic completely.

Come on, I love coming onto a poker forum every day and talking with you jack-asses. I am obviously not concerned with my rep.Was I wrong that there are more Catholics than Protestants?

[SBriand]

brvheart, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:12 PM, said:

It would be better for your "rep" if you avoided this topic completely.

Why? I see nothing that he said that damages his rep. Or do you mean his rep among God fearing people? Meh, who cares about that.

[CaneBrain]

SBriand, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:14 PM, said:

Why? I see nothing that he said that damages his rep. Or do you mean his rep among God fearing people? Meh, who cares about that.

<-------------Steve approvedBy the way, you and my wife would have a dandy time comparing stories about poor people and minorities. I showed her one of your older rants the other day and she was like 'meh, that IS nothing.'

[Balloon guy]

CaneBrain, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 9:14 AM, said:

Come on, I love coming onto a poker forum every day and talking with you jack-asses. I am obviously not concerned with my rep.Was I wrong that there are more Catholics than Protestants?

I don't know and don't care enough to check, but I am a protestant, and all my posts will be from that perspective.Except the ones where I mock you guys, those are from my fat old white guy perspective.

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 8:53 AM, said:

Let me get this straight.... You are saying that smart actually means: having less knowledge and critical thinking skills than others but being more convinced of religious doctrines? While we're redefining things, why not just agree that "atheists" should refer to those people who believe in god?

Step back for a second and give that there is a God and you are processing the data incorrectly.Would you still argue that your critical thinking skills are quite so praise worthy?The Bible does this for my side, Paul wrote that if there was no resurrection from the dead, than we of all people are the most pathetic.So I have no problem looking at the possibility that I am wrong and acknowledging that I my whole life will have been a waste.But the good thing is that I won't have to pay for being wrong about Christianity<-----freerolling

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 9:46 AM, said:

Step back for a second and give that there is a God and you are processing the data incorrectly.Would you still argue that your critical thinking skills are quite so praise worthy?

Yes. The alternative is that my critical thinking skills work really well in all arenas except when it comes to this one issue. That was my whole point really: from the perspective of god being real, those who are right about this one issue are more likely to be wrong on others, and to have lower IQs. Does that make any sense?

Quote

The Bible does this for my side, Paul wrote that if there was no resurrection from the dead, than we of all people are the most pathetic.

He said it, not me!

Quote

So I have no problem looking at the possibility that I am wrong and acknowledging that I my whole life will have been a waste.But the good thing is that I won't have to pay for being wrong about Christianity<-----freerolling

You are paying for being wrong about christianity.Think about it: is it really possible that there is no cost to being wrong about something like this?

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 10:23 AM, said:

Yes. The alternative is that my critical thinking skills work really well in all arenas except when it comes to this one issue. That was my whole point really: from the perspective of god being real, those who are right about this one issue are more likely to be wrong on others, and to have lower IQs. Does that make any sense?

Do you know anyone in your office that isn't a raving liberal tree hugging pot smoker?How about anyone who thinks that Michel Vick doesn't run the ball enough?Or that Studdard never should have beat Aiken?Anyone vote for McCain instead of Obama?There are lots of ways for people to differ with another's views without it being the one thing that means all their other choices are wrong.You are arguing that you are 100% right about the entire understanding of the entire metaphysical world. And anyone who disagrees is not thinking correct.I would say that this is a common trait of atheist, they are completely closed to any world view but their own, and they use an opinion as their proof.

Quote

He said it, not me!

Thanks for admitting that the Bible is accurate when quoting Paul from the 1st century AD.Now how do you deal with the rest of what Paul said?

Quote

You are paying for being wrong about christianity.Think about it: is it really possible that there is no cost to being wrong about something like this?

Let's see, I am happy, I treat others better, I give my money to those in need, and I obey the government and pay my taxes.And when I die, the people who love me will all feel sad, but with that sadness will be the belief that I am living forever in Heaven. So their grief is tempered with hope.Yea, I can see why you would want to have my religion removed from society.

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 11:03 AM, said:

There are lots of ways for people to differ with another's views without it being the one thing that means all their other choices are wrong.

Wait a minute, are you saying that the religious people were actually answering more correctly than the atheists about the bible, we just have the answers backwards?

Quote

You are arguing that you are 100% right about the entire understanding of the entire metaphysical world. And anyone who disagrees is not thinking correct.

I thought we were speaking hypothetically about the consequences of being right or wrong about metaphysical issues. I did not realize the fact that religious people have less factual knowledge and lower IQs was in dispute, especially when it came to the the actual religious knowledge poll that brought us to this point.

Quote

Let's see, I am happy, I treat others better, I give my money to those in need, and I obey the government and pay my taxes.And when I die, the people who love me will all feel sad, but with that sadness will be the belief that I am living forever in Heaven. So their grief is tempered with hope.Yea, I can see why you would want to have my religion removed from society.

But we are considering the hypothetical that you are wrong, so the living in heaven part is not happening. I'm not saying you haven't done anything good, or that your net impact on the world hasn't been positive. I'm asking you to think about what negative effects there would be from you being wrong about this very important issue.

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 11:33 AM, said:

Wait a minute, are you saying that the religious people were actually answering more correctly than the atheists about the bible, we just have the answers backwards?

You know how often the atheist in this forum think they are right about that Bible and aren't? Like 99%

Quote

I thought we were speaking hypothetically about the consequences of being right or wrong about metaphysical issues.

Well then you were wrong more than once with the same arguments. Congratulations, you get an A for efficiency,

Quote

I did not realize the fact that religious people have less factual knowledge and lower IQs was in dispute, especially when it came to the the actual religious knowledge poll that brought us to this point.

Anyone who places value on IQ tests deserves to be wrong about what they mean. Knowing that it was Elisha and not Eliza that said something doesn't make you know more about the Bible in anyway except useless knowledge. Pretending that Christians don't know the Bible as well as atheist because an atheist knows the order of the OT books and then planting a flag of triumph on this result isn't helping you argue about your critical reasoning skills very much.

Quote

But we are considering the hypothetical that you are wrong, so the living in heaven part is not happening. I'm not saying you haven't done anything good, or that your net impact on the world hasn't been positive. I'm asking you to think about what negative effects there would be from you being wrong about this very important issue.

When I die..I cease to exist, and escape any results of my being wrong.Exactly the same results will happen to me if I die believing that Darwin wasn't a fool who based his theory on bad science.So if I die and there is no God... I gain and lose the exact same thing.Now let's ask what negative effects there would be for you about this very important issue?

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:07 PM, said:

You know how often the atheist in this forum think they are right about that Bible and aren't? Like 99%

Ok, then which is the first book of the bible?

Quote

Anyone who places value on IQ tests deserves to be wrong about what they mean. Knowing that it was Elisha and not Eliza that said something doesn't make you know more about the Bible in anyway except useless knowledge. Pretending that Christians don't know the Bible as well as atheist because an atheist knows the order of the OT books and then planting a flag of triumph on this result isn't helping you argue about your critical reasoning skills very much.

They didn't ask obscure stuff about what Elisha or Eliza said. This was basic knowledge-type stuff that the christians didn't know. They don't know who the vice-president is. The christians all act like they are in a segment of Jay-walking. Why do you think they are so stupid? I know my answer: lacking critical thinking skills is a prerequisite for accepting absurd religious doctrines. What's yours?

Quote

When I die..I cease to exist, and escape any results of my being wrong.Exactly the same results will happen to me if I die believing that Darwin wasn't a fool who based his theory on bad science.So if I die and there is no God... I gain and lose the exact same thing.

1. What will you have lost during your life though? 2. How will your effect on the world be negative?

Quote

Now let's ask what negative effects there would be for you about this very important issue?

That's obvious though, religious people tell us that all the time. I burn in hell, and have helped others to do so.

[SBriand]

Balloon guy, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 2:03 PM, said:

Let's see, I am happy, I treat others better, I give my money to those in need, and I obey the government and pay my taxes.And when I die, the people who love me will all feel sad, but with that sadness will be the belief that I am living forever in Heaven. So their grief is tempered with hope.Yea, I can see why you would want to have my religion removed from society.

What does that actually have to do with Religion?I am happy (believe it or not sickies!), I generally treat most people nicely, I give to charity and all the bums outside the Tigers games, I obey the government (which has nothing to do with this conversation) and I pay my taxes (which also has nothing to do with this conversation).And when I die, the people who love me will feel sad but will also celebrate my life and either hope or believe I am in a better place.But I am not religious. Neither is my wife, or most of my family for the most part. You can still do good things in life without going to church once a week or reading the bible. You can still hope or believe that after a loved one's death they might be in a better place. Usually people think/hope/believe that to help their grieving though. So yeah, religion is not necessarily needed. But I am not asking for it to be removed. Go ahead, if it helps lead certain people away from being bad then go for it. If it makes you happy, go for it. But I am not interested so leave me alone.

[Balloon guy]

SBriand, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:33 PM, said:

What does that actually have to do with Religion?I am happy (believe it or not sickies!), I generally treat most people nicely, I give to charity and all the bums outside the Tigers games, I obey the government (which has nothing to do with this conversation) and I pay my taxes (which also has nothing to do with this conversation).And when I die, the people who love me will feel sad but will also celebrate my life and either hope or believe I am in a better place.But I am not religious. Neither is my wife, or most of my family for the most part. You can still do good things in life without going to church once a week or reading the bible. You can still hope or believe that after a loved one's death they might be in a better place. Usually people think/hope/believe that to help their grieving though. So yeah, religion is not necessarily needed. But I am not asking for it to be removed. Go ahead, if it helps lead certain people away from being bad then go for it. If it makes you happy, go for it. But I am not interested so leave me alone.

Only responding to vb directly saying to me:

Quote

You are paying for being wrong about Christianity.Think about it: is it really possible that there is no cost to being wrong about something like this?

I agree that you can be a non-Christian and be a very good person, and you can be a Christian and be a really bad person.The issue I would argue is that a person who is a Christian will be better than that exact same person would be before he accepts Christ.That and atheist are a short step away from being communist.Those two things.

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:24 PM, said:

Ok, then which is the first book of the bible?

If you only have the NT you would be fine.

Quote

They didn't ask obscure stuff about what Elisha or Eliza said. This was basic knowledge-type stuff that the christians didn't know. They don't know who the vice-president is.

What is basic knowledge about US government? That the house has x number of members? or that running on a 'change social security' ticket will never work?

Quote

The christians all act like they are in a segment of Jay-walking. Why do you think they are so stupid?

A lot of us are?Being stupid does not in anyway lend credibility to anything being true or false. If it did, then all democrats would be idiooo....oh now I see.I change my mind, you are right.

Quote

I know my answer: lacking critical thinking skills is a prerequisite for accepting absurd religious doctrines. What's yours?

Which critical thinking skill gives you better memory for recalling dry facts?Because that's all this poll was.

Quote

1. What will you have lost during your life though?

Well, I'm out a bit of cash...and I probably missed a few golf rounds on Sunday morning. Oh and I lost my being lost in the world, and being suicidal. And I lost being shy around women. Those things I guess.

Quote

2. How will your effect on the world be negative?

hmm, not killing myself resulted in me smoking more cigars, which causes the hole in the ozone, which brings us closer to the future where melanoma concentration in the skin is the most important trait for survival, meaning the end of white man's dominance.Is that was this is all about for you? Losing your racial superiority?

Quote

That's obvious though, religious people tell us that all the time. I burn in hell, and have helped others to do so.

So which of us is really risking losing anything at all? You or me?

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Wednesday, October 6th, 2010, 12:57 PM, said:

A lot of us are?

But the data show that more christians are than non-christians. Why is that?

Quote

Being stupid does not in anyway lend credibility to anything being true or false.

That's stupid.

Quote

Which critical thinking skill gives you better memory for recalling dry facts?Because that's all this poll was.

I would tell you, but you'll just forget right away.

Quote

Well, I'm out a bit of cash...and I probably missed a few golf rounds on Sunday morning. Oh and I lost my being lost in the world, and being suicidal. And I lost being shy around women. Those things I guess.

Wait since when does being a christian make you a ladies man? If it did, what a waste that would be: you are now the most attractive man on the planet to women, but you can't have any of them. ( OK, maybe just one. )

Quote

hmm, not killing myself resulted in me smoking more cigars, which causes the hole in the ozone, which brings us closer to the future where melanoma concentration in the skin is the most important trait for survival, meaning the end of white man's dominance.Is that was this is all about for you? Losing your racial superiority?

Was I supposed to kill myself for not being christian? Goddammit I have to stop skimming over the minutes at the weekly atheist meetings.