Jump to content

Evidence Of Life After Death


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 428
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it's interesting, but not really convincing evidence. for one just because they weren't able to measure brain activity didn't mean conclusively that it wasn't still going on at some level. we don't understand brain function very well.and also there are other objective studies that have shown the brain has a remarkable ability to *backill* information - to create memory based on current information that wasn't available, particularly during times of extreme stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites
it's interesting, but not really convincing evidence. for one just because they weren't able to measure brain activity didn't mean conclusively that it wasn't still going on at some level. we don't understand brain function very well.and also there are other objective studies that have shown the brain has a remarkable ability to *backill* information - to create memory based on current information that wasn't available, particularly during times of extreme stress.
No evidence of brain activity. Strong evidence showing no brain activity whatsoever. No blood flowing through brain, no brain stem function, no brain function found. All 3 scientific tests used to measure brain activity came out negative.This case has nothing to do with "backill" of information. She described things in the operating room when she was brain dead that were accurate that she otherwise couldn't have known.
Link to post
Share on other sites

What about ghosts, spirits, etc?I've seen scientific studies where certain characteristics of "ghosts", i.e., walking through walls, is impossible because mass would be required to have the ghost be seen walking through walls anyway.However, I my non-scientific argument would be that there are many, many more personal accounts and video/photo evidence of ghosts than of angels/Gods, etc.Any thoughts? Does the fact that a ghost looked basically the same 2,000 years ago as it does today bear any creedence? Is there any scientific room for a blending of dimensions?

Link to post
Share on other sites
This case has nothing to do with "backill" of information. She described things in the operating room when she was brain dead that were accurate that she otherwise couldn't have known.
in what scientifically controlled experimental sense did she describe things that she couldn't have known about otherwise? was it documented that the nurse said something while she was dead and she repeated it afterwords verbatim? no.was it documented that she couldn't have possibly been aware of the instrument she described from another time before or after? no.it's a nice story that might indicate something IS going on with life after death, but it is not scientific evidence that something is.
Link to post
Share on other sites
in what scientifically controlled experimental sense did she describe things that she couldn't have known about otherwise? was it documented that the nurse said something while she was dead and she repeated it afterwords verbatim? no.was it documented that she couldn't have possibly been aware of the instrument she described from another time before or after? no.it's a nice story that might indicate something IS going on with life after death, but it is not scientific evidence that something is.
Skeptics looking at this case in more detail have yet to come to the conclusion that it was anything but a real memory.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Skeptics looking at this case in more detail have yet to come to the conclusion that it was anything but a real memory.
what skeptics? skeptical scientists would correctly say that there's no evidence either way, because there were no controls in place that would verify or refute what anyone is saying about the event. after-the-fact accounts and hearsay are not evidence. if they were UFO's, bigfoot, loch ness monster etc should all be considered supported by scientific evidence, which is obviously preposterous.in truth this site appears to have a pre-set agenda, and is using its own non-objective spin on what constitutes evidence to sell books. same is obviously true with chopra's site/book, which is spinning the evidence to meet a pre-set agenda, and to tell people like theresa who already have a predisposition to believe in a soul exactly what they want to hear AND SELL BOOKS.near death & out of body experiences, memories of previous lives etc. are all interesting phenomena that are worthy of exploring scientifically, but to this point there is no hard evidence that the brain isn't capable of self-fabricating all of it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
what skeptics? skeptical scientists would correctly say that there's no evidence either way, because there were no controls in place that would verify or refute what anyone is saying about the event. after-the-fact accounts and hearsay are not evidence. if they were UFO's, bigfoot, loch ness monster etc should all be considered supported by scientific evidence, which is obviously preposterous.in truth this site appears to have a pre-set agenda, and is using its own non-objective spin on what constitutes evidence to sell books. same is obviously true with chopra's site/book, which is spinning the evidence to meet a pre-set agenda, and to tell people like theresa who already have a predisposition to believe in a soul exactly what they want to hear AND SELL BOOKS.near death & out of body experiences, memories of previous lives etc. are all interesting phenomena that are worthy of exploring scientifically, but to this point there is no hard evidence that the brain isn't capable of self-fabricating all of it.
You are right. It is not scientificly proven. It isn't scientificly proven that I breathed today either.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You are right. It is not scientificly proven. It isn't scientificly proven that I breathed today either.
assuming that's a serious analogy (in which case :club: ) note that there is a huge amount of hard scientific evidence that indicates humans are incapable of holding their breath for 24 hours without dying, so given that you aren't dead it is extremely likely you did breath today.there is no such hard scientific evidence that supports the likelyhood of the existence of a soul.
Link to post
Share on other sites
assuming that's a serious analogy (in which case :club: ) note that there is a huge amount of hard scientific evidence that indicates humans are incapable of holding their breath for 24 hours without dying, so given that you aren't dead it is extremely likely you did breath today.there is no such hard scientific evidence that supports the likelyhood of the existence of a soul.
Millions of people have reported having a near death experience where they view things outside their unconscious bodies. It is extremely likely that consciousness exists outside the body."All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." -Albert Einstein
Link to post
Share on other sites
Millions of people have reported having a near death experience where they view things outside their unconscious bodies. It is extremely likely that consciousness exists outside the body.
millions? exaggerate much lol?anyway there are many cases where false memory brought about by stress or other causes has been scientifically demonstrated. in fact some studies seem to indicate that the brain is creating false or backfilled short-term memory continually as part of its *normal* function. and for that matter many more people than have had NDE's have seen UFO's and reported that they were real. BILLIONS of people report that their religous beliefs are real even though they are mutually incompatable with the beliefs of billions of others who also report theirs are real. obviously the brain is quite capable of convincing itself that something that isn't true is. until we have a better understanding of how the brain, memory, and consciousness work any number of recounted NDEs while intriguing are not direct evidence for a soul. they are only evidence that we don't understand everything that goes on in the brain.
"All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." -Albert Einstein
einstein is the all-time king of being quoted out of context.
Link to post
Share on other sites
millions? exaggerate much lol?anyway there are many cases where false memory brought about by stress or other causes has been scientifically demonstrated. in fact some studies seem to indicate that the brain is creating false or backfilled short-term memory continually as part of its *normal* function. and for that matter many more people than have had NDE's have seen UFO's and reported that they were real. BILLIONS of people report that their religous beliefs are real even though they are mutually incompatable with the beliefs of billions of others who also report theirs are real. obviously the brain is quite capable of convincing itself that something that isn't true is. until we have a better understanding of how the brain, memory, and consciousness work any number of recounted NDEs while intriguing are not direct evidence for a soul. they are only evidence that we don't understand everything that goes on in the brain.einstein is the all-time king of being quoted out of context.
The Gallup Organization and near death research studies estimates ADULT U.S. near death experiences at 13 million.The brain is purely physical. We can tell when it is not working at all. This article doesn't go into great detail about how the doctors know what she told them couldn't have been otherwise known. Again, no skeptic has looked at the documented facts in detail and found that it was even a real possibility that she could have known what she saw and heard without having this experience. How is that quote out of context?
Link to post
Share on other sites
The Gallup Organization and near death research studies estimates ADULT U.S. near death experiences at 13 million.
that just sounds like more spin. link? my understanding is that cases where a person is medically documented as having bodily functions cease for any extended amount of time and then restart, and then that person recounted an out-of-body experience are relatively rare. thousands at the most, certainly not millions. presumably if that poll is limited to cases that can be corroborated in any way the results would be radically different.
The brain is purely physical. We can tell when it is not working at all.
so you are a neurological scientist then? or are you just saying that because a website with an agenda says it?
This article doesn't go into great detail about how the doctors know what she told them couldn't have been otherwise known.
necessarily i assume.
Again, no skeptic has looked at the documented facts in detail and found that it was even a real possibility that she could have known what she saw and heard without having this experience.
again, specifically what skeptics? do you have to buy the book to find out? : )
How is that quote out of context?
you'll have to cite what work that quote is from since i'm not familiar with it, which presumably you can't since you just copied it from the above website. i'm assuming the quote was about experiencing physical evidence and not referring directly to metaphysical experiences, since einstien believed in natural (physical) determinism. please correct me if i'm wrong.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Millions of people have reported having a near death experience where they view things outside their unconscious bodies. It is extremely likely that consciousness exists outside the body.
Wrong..... What an NDE shows is that when the brain is deprived of oxygen, certain areas of the brain shut down, causing a psychotic episode.We have definitions like "brain dead" where we can't measure brain fucntion, but that is because even when we "die" the individual cells of our body are still alive, sometimes for many hours... this is how we can take a heart out of someone, put it on ice, fly it to another city, then put it into a new person. The person it came out of is "dead" but his tissues are still alive.So, even while someone is "brain dead", their brain is still alive. The electro chemical activity may be so low that it doesn't register on our tests, but it is still there. And just because the conscious areas are shut down does not mean the other areas aren't still processing sights and sounds, and recording them as memories.When I say "psychotic episode", am I saying that people that have an NDE are crazy? NO!!!!!!!I'm saying that this is how the human brain works.Prayer and meditation are very similar.... When sitting quietly, ignoring outside input, focusing internally very strongly, one "shuts down" the portion of the brain that connects you to the outside world.... You feel like you're floating.Lots of drugs shut down certain areas of the brain and make people fell "outer body experiences".... where do you think the term "mind-expanding" drugs comes from? Do people really experience asteral projection? Can yogis really project into prior lives and levitate? When on Payote, do Native Americans really turn into animals? Is Deja Vu really experiencing something twice?Or is this all just a trick of the brain?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Wrong..... What an NDE shows is that when the brain is deprived of oxygen, certain areas of the brain shut down, causing a psychotic episode .
Not in this case. The lady accurately reported what was going on when she was physically dead by all available scientific measurements.
that just sounds like more spin. link? my understanding is that cases where a person is medically documented as having bodily functions cease for any extended amount of time and then restart, and then that person recounted an out-of-body experience are relatively rare. thousands at the most, certainly not millions. presumably if that poll is limited to cases that can be corroborated in any way the results would be radically different.so you are a neurological scientist then? or are you just saying that because a website with an agenda says it?necessarily i assume.again, specifically what skeptics? do you have to buy the book to find out? : ) you'll have to cite what work that quote is from since i'm not familiar with it, which presumably you can't since you just copied it from the above website. i'm assuming the quote was about experiencing physical evidence and not referring directly to metaphysical experiences, since einstien believed in natural (physical) determinism. please correct me if i'm wrong.
Maybe the figure is off a couple million.There is no evidence suggesting the brain is something other than a physical thing.G.M Woerlee is a well known skeptic. His arguements regarding this case are very weak.So you disagree with what the quote says?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Not in this case. The lady accurately reported what was going on when she was physically dead by all available scientific measurements.
She wan't dead by the scientific measure of the brain tissues being dead.... It was "shut down" for the most part, but it was not "dead".And, there is no reason to think she could not be recording sights and sounds into the memory storage portion of her brain....even with the consciousness turned off.I will turn this around. I saw a story on Discovery Channel of a guy that was sevearly brain damaged n a car crash.... he was listed as brain damaged to the point where a meaningful recovery was not possible. Like the veg in Florida that caused so much trouble a couple years ago. Well, this veg later regained the ability to speak.... So, the show was called "the man that slept for 16 years" or some such. He seems to be fully conscious. He recognizes some people and places..... He can carry on a conversation.BUT, his problem is that he is incapable of recordning any new memories. zip, zilch, nada. To him, it is 1984... You can tell him the current date, then 10 seconds later, ask him the date... He'll tell you 1984. He recognizes his mom, but not his daughter... Who is now in her 20s instead of diapers. In fact, he is constantly coming onto his daughter because he doesn't know, and can't be taught that it is her.In short, it is the mirror image of the NDE. In an NDE, consciousness is shut down, but memories are still recorded. In this case, he's conscious, but not able to record memories.So, if the "soul"... consciousness outsie the body... is the ability to record memories when not conscious, is this guy "soul-dead"? His body is alive, but his soul is dead?Well, the CT scans just show dead and wilted gooo where his short-term memory portion of his brain is supposed to be. And, short-term memory are the patterns used to build long-term... So, while he has consciousness and long-term memories, he can't create new memories.The brain works all funny like this.....So, I don't find it hard to believe that the memory portion of the brain could be recording short-term memories, then those short-term memories moved off to long-term, even when the consciousness is "shut down".
Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe the figure is off a couple million.
maybe the website you are copying this stuff from is misrepresenting the poll.
There is no evidence suggesting the brain is something other than a physical thing.
yes, and same is true of consciousness and memory.
So you disagree with what the quote says?
without context the quote doesn't say anything.
Link to post
Share on other sites
She wan't dead by the scientific measure of the brain tissues being dead.... It was "shut down" for the most part, but it was not "dead".And, there is no reason to think she could not be recording sights and sounds into the memory storage portion of her brain....even with the consciousness turned off.I will turn this around. I saw a story on Discovery Channel of a guy that was sevearly brain damaged n a car crash.... he was listed as brain damaged to the point where a meaningful recovery was not possible. Like the veg in Florida that caused so much trouble a couple years ago. Well, this veg later regained the ability to speak.... So, the show was called "the man that slept for 16 years" or some such. He seems to be fully conscious. He recognizes some people and places..... He can carry on a conversation.BUT, his problem is that he is incapable of recordning any new memories. zip, zilch, nada. To him, it is 1984... You can tell him the current date, then 10 seconds later, ask him the date... He'll tell you 1984. He recognizes his mom, but not his daughter... Who is now in her 20s instead of diapers. In fact, he is constantly coming onto his daughter because he doesn't know, and can't be taught that it is her.In short, it is the mirror image of the NDE. In an NDE, consciousness is shut down, but memories are still recorded. In this case, he's conscious, but not able to record memories.So, if the "soul"... consciousness outsie the body... is the ability to record memories when not conscious, is this guy "soul-dead"? His body is alive, but his soul is dead?Well, the CT scans just show dead and wilted gooo where his short-term memory portion of his brain is supposed to be. And, short-term memory are the patterns used to build long-term... So, while he has consciousness and long-term memories, he can't create new memories.The brain works all funny like this.....So, I don't find it hard to believe that the memory portion of the brain could be recording short-term memories, then those short-term memories moved off to long-term, even when the consciousness is "shut down".
With no recorded brain function she could see things(eyes were also taped shut). I thought you needed your eyes and brain to see?
without context the quote doesn't say anything.
Haha. "All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." What part of that quote do you need help with?
Link to post
Share on other sites
With no recorded brain function she could see things(eyes were also taped shut). I thought you needed your eyes and brain to see?
Dude, you're SOOOO far from proof on this.It has been studied over and over....... NDE is not "real""A well-known scientific hypothesis that attempts to explain NDEs was originally suggested by Dr. Karl Jansen (1995;1997) and deals with accounts of the side-effects of the drug Ketamine. Ketamine was used as an anesthetic on U.S. soldiers during the Vietnam War; but its use was abandoned and never spread to civilian use because the soldiers complained about sensations of floating above their body and seeing bright lights. Further experiments by numerous researchers verified that intravenous injections of ketamine could reproduce all of the commonly cited features of an NDE; including a sense that the experience is "real" and that one is actually dead, separation from the body, visions of loved ones, and transcendent mystical experiences. Ketamine acts in part by blocking the NMDA receptor for the neurotransmitter glutamate. Glutamate is released in abundance when brain cells die, and if it weren't blocked, the glutamate overload would cause other brain cells to die as well. In the presence of excess glutamate, the brain releases its own NMDA receptor blocker to defend itself; and it is these blockers Dr. Jansen (amongst others) hypothesize as the cause of many NDEs.""Among the studies that support a naturalistic interpretation we find the research of Blanke et.al (2002), published in Nature Magazine [3], who found that electrical stimulation of the brain region known as the right angular gyrus repeatedly caused out-of-body experiences in the patient[4]; though the patient did not report seeing her own face, for example.""Researchers have largely been unsuccessful in running proactive experiments to establish out-of-body consciousness. There have been numerous experiments in which a random message was placed in a hospital in a manner that it would be invisible to patients or staff yet visible to a floating being, but so far, according to Blackmore (1991), these experiments have only provided equivocal results and no clear signs of ESP.""Related to the findings of Jansen we find the work of Strassman (2001) who induced near death experiences (in addition to some different naturally-occurring altered states of being) in a clinical setting by injecting subjects with DMT, a powerful psychedelic tryptamine. Because DMT is a chemical that is produced endogenously in the human pineal gland it might be relevant to the study of NDE's and other mystical, religious, and transpersonal experiences. Related to the findings of Jansen we also find the theory of Shawn Thomas (2004), director of Neurotransmitter.net, who has suggested that the neurotransmitter agmatine is the key substance involved in near-death experiences [5].It is generally accepted that some people who reported NDEs were shown to have approached the clinical boundary between life and death. However, in support of a naturalistic interpretation of NDE's one might argue that it is not shown that the experiences themselves took place in any time other than just before the clinical death, or in the process of being revived. In altered states of consciousness such as this and during dream states or under the influence of drugs, the subjective perception of time is often dilated."It's brain chemicals dude...... Just like yogi's flying and "feeling God" while praying and native Americans turning into animals and asteral projection.... All of it... It is just a psychotic episode..... A loss of conection to reality.
Link to post
Share on other sites
"All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." What part of that quote do you need help with?
since einstien did not believe in the metaphysical i need help with how anyone would think that quote applies to this situation. it doesn't.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, this veg later regained the ability to speak.... So, the show was called "the man that slept for 16 years" or some such. He seems to be fully conscious. He recognizes some people and places..... He can carry on a conversation.
There are two different kinds of consciousness, "phenomenal consciousness" and "access conciousness". Phenomenal is "I am, I was" consciousness, and access conciousness is being abstractly (not instinctively) aware of the environment. This guy is access conscious, but doesn't appear to be doing better than that and his most primal instincts. Maybe he lost his "soul"?
With no recorded brain function she could see things(eyes were also taped shut). I thought you needed your eyes and brain to see?Haha. "All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it." What part of that quote do you need help with?
The problem with the argument between you and Crow is that is has been agreed among the scientific community that phenomenal consciousness is not really empircally testable. While there are "mirror tests" and such, they don't really pass hard scientific muster. Can we not therefore rely on case study and qualitiative analysis to evaluate things like NDE's, or should we ignore the plethora of phenomenon until we can explain it on paper?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Dude, you're SOOOO far from proof on this.It has been studied over and over....... NDE is not "real""A well-known scientific hypothesis that attempts to explain NDEs was originally suggested by Dr. Karl Jansen (1995;1997) and deals with accounts of the side-effects of the drug Ketamine. Ketamine was used as an anesthetic on U.S. soldiers during the Vietnam War; but its use was abandoned and never spread to civilian use because the soldiers complained about sensations of floating above their body and seeing bright lights. Further experiments by numerous researchers verified that intravenous injections of ketamine could reproduce all of the commonly cited features of an NDE; including a sense that the experience is "real" and that one is actually dead, separation from the body, visions of loved ones, and transcendent mystical experiences. Ketamine acts in part by blocking the NMDA receptor for the neurotransmitter glutamate. Glutamate is released in abundance when brain cells die, and if it weren't blocked, the glutamate overload would cause other brain cells to die as well. In the presence of excess glutamate, the brain releases its own NMDA receptor blocker to defend itself; and it is these blockers Dr. Jansen (amongst others) hypothesize as the cause of many NDEs.""Among the studies that support a naturalistic interpretation we find the research of Blanke et.al (2002), published in Nature Magazine [3], who found that electrical stimulation of the brain region known as the right angular gyrus repeatedly caused out-of-body experiences in the patient[4]; though the patient did not report seeing her own face, for example.""Researchers have largely been unsuccessful in running proactive experiments to establish out-of-body consciousness. There have been numerous experiments in which a random message was placed in a hospital in a manner that it would be invisible to patients or staff yet visible to a floating being, but so far, according to Blackmore (1991), these experiments have only provided equivocal results and no clear signs of ESP.""Related to the findings of Jansen we find the work of Strassman (2001) who induced near death experiences (in addition to some different naturally-occurring altered states of being) in a clinical setting by injecting subjects with DMT, a powerful psychedelic tryptamine. Because DMT is a chemical that is produced endogenously in the human pineal gland it might be relevant to the study of NDE's and other mystical, religious, and transpersonal experiences. Related to the findings of Jansen we also find the theory of Shawn Thomas (2004), director of Neurotransmitter.net, who has suggested that the neurotransmitter agmatine is the key substance involved in near-death experiences [5].It is generally accepted that some people who reported NDEs were shown to have approached the clinical boundary between life and death. However, in support of a naturalistic interpretation of NDE's one might argue that it is not shown that the experiences themselves took place in any time other than just before the clinical death, or in the process of being revived. In altered states of consciousness such as this and during dream states or under the influence of drugs, the subjective perception of time is often dilated."It's brain chemicals dude...... Just like yogi's flying and "feeling God" while praying and native Americans turning into animals and asteral projection.... All of it... It is just a psychotic episode..... A loss of conection to reality.
It has been documented that what she saw in the operating room was real. Not a psychotic episode.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...