Jump to content


Should Cigar Lovers Be Eligible For Season-end Freeroll And Next Season?


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

Poll: Should Cigar Lover's default be forgiven? (31 member(s) have cast votes)

Should they be in for the freefroll and next season?

  1. Yes, members of Cigar Lovers should be in for the freeroll and invited back next season (12 votes [38.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.71%

  2. They can play the freeroll, but not be automatically invited back (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. They are out of the freeroll, but are invited back next season (9 votes [29.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.03%

  4. No, they defaulted and we know the rules (10 votes [32.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.26%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 sloshr

sloshr

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 754 posts
  • Location:Covina, CA
  • Favorite Poker Game:mixed, esp with badugi

Posted 01 August 2006 - 07:25 PM

In case any of you missed it, the Cigar Lovers defaulted on the last week of the season because their player, noneck, was hospitalized, while the rest of the team was on vacation. This default knocked them out of the playoff race, but did not appear to affect any other teams. I believe that in THIS CASE ONLY, the default should be forgiven and they should be treated like the teams without a default. They were definitely an active part of this league and would never have defaulted under normal circumstances. Also, this league would not be the same without Balloon Guy.I am creating this poll to see if the majority of the league agrees with me. I hope that Sleuthis will consider these results when deciding whether to enforce the rules in this extreme case.

#2 sleuthis

sleuthis

    Poker Forum Groupie

  • Members
  • 744 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ajax Ontario

Posted 02 August 2006 - 07:01 PM

View Postsloshr, on Tuesday, August 1st, 2006, 11:25 PM, said:

In case any of you missed it, the Cigar Lovers defaulted on the last week of the season because their player, noneck, was hospitalized, while the rest of the team was on vacation. This default knocked them out of the playoff race, but did not appear to affect any other teams. I believe that in THIS CASE ONLY, the default should be forgiven and they should be treated like the teams without a default. They were definitely an active part of this league and would never have defaulted under normal circumstances. Also, this league would not be the same without Balloon Guy.I am creating this poll to see if the majority of the league agrees with me. I hope that Sleuthis will consider these results when deciding whether to enforce the rules in this extreme case.
I can tell you this much - ANY team which defaulted will not be part of the freeroll.As for next season - daniel and I will discuss any of the teams preceeding the next season.

#3 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 August 2006 - 07:19 PM

View Postsleuthis, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 8:01 AM, said:

I can tell you this much - ANY team which defaulted will not be part of the freeroll.As for next season - daniel and I will discuss any of the teams preceeding the next season.
I'm sorry but I disagree and I think it's kind of sad they can't play the freeroll. It's obvious this was a special case, and I think being in the HOSPITAL is a good reason to miss a HU match. They are good guys, and I don't think any of the other freeroll teams would be willing to openly say they don't think the Cigar Lovers should be able to play.

#4 fleung22

fleung22

    PokerStars Global Events Rep (PokerStars Macau)

  • Members
  • 6,997 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver-->Toronto-->Macau

Posted 02 August 2006 - 07:49 PM

View PostGrinderMJ, on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 7:19 PM, said:

I'm sorry but I disagree and I think it's kind of sad they can't play the freeroll. It's obvious this was a special case, and I think being in the HOSPITAL is a good reason to miss a HU match. They are good guys, and I don't think any of the other freeroll teams would be willing to openly say they don't think the Cigar Lovers should be able to play.
Agreed...it totally sucks and seems unfair. How can you fault a guy for getting mugged!?However, you can't logistically run a league without quantifiable rules.If you let this slide and let Sleuthis or Daniel decide what is excusable and what isn't then where do we draw the line? Somebody's wife having a baby...that's pretty important right?Or how about the death of a pet? Many pet lovers would rather lose their arm than lose their dog.I feel bad for No Neck and the crew but at the same time I think that giving them a pardon opens the door to a lot of other problems down the road (re: flat out lying). The truth of the matter is they had no back-up so they got no back-up.


#5 jayboogie

jayboogie

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,493 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:01 PM

View Postfleung22, on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 11:49 PM, said:

I feel bad for No Neck and the crew but at the same time I think that giving them a pardon opens the door to a lot of other problems down the road (re: flat out lying). The truth of the matter is they had no back-up so they got no back-up.
That's pretty much the reason why the rules are in place and enforced the way they are. Who's to stop someone from lying and coming up with some BS excuse in order to avoid getting a default? I'm not saying anyone would do this or has done this, but by allowing special exceptions, it opens the possibility of something like this occurring.

#6 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:44 PM

Come on, there is no need to be robots about the rules. Do you honestly think people are going to start making up tragic events for why they missed a game? I don't. The argument well if we allow this, what's next? is absurd to me. It's not that hard to make decision on a case by case basis, and in my opinion, this is a default that should be forgiven.

#7 chaosnhavoc

chaosnhavoc

    I'm a Winner Baby

  • Members
  • 1,636 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ca

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:54 PM

View PostGrinderMJ, on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 9:44 PM, said:

Come on, there is no need to be robots about the rules. Do you honestly think people are going to start making up tragic events for why they missed a game? I don't. The argument well if we allow this, what's next? is absurd to me. It's not that hard to make decision on a case by case basis, and in my opinion, this is a default that should be forgiven.
:club: :D Agree Totally.
**** off with your sofa units and strine green stripe patterns, I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may.- Tyler Durden

#8 zimmer4141

zimmer4141

    GO BLUE

  • Members
  • 15,007 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ann Arbor, MI
  • Interests:Hockey, Golf

Posted 02 August 2006 - 08:57 PM

I would like to forgive it in this case, but if we do it now, are we going to take away Broccoli's default when their one and only player apparently had a family emergency? I just think that we have to enforce it no matter what, and I think it is up to the opponent the team is facing as to whether or not they are willing to reschedule.
Hail To the Victors Valiant
Hail To the Conquering Heroes
Hail Hail To Michigan
The Leaders and Best

#9 jayboogie

jayboogie

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,493 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 02 August 2006 - 09:02 PM

View PostGrinderMJ, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 12:44 AM, said:

Come on, there is no need to be robots about the rules. Do you honestly think people are going to start making up tragic events for why they missed a game? I don't. The argument well if we allow this, what's next? is absurd to me. It's not that hard to make decision on a case by case basis, and in my opinion, this is a default that should be forgiven.
That's kind of a naive point of view. The fact of the matter is when money is on the line, people will sometimes lie, cheat and steal in order to get it. Maybe you haven't personally experienced this, but I know of people who have cheated in bigger games and people who have cheated playing $5 buyin home game tournaments. People will do things out of their normal character sometimes when there is money on the line. Obviously I'm not saying anyone would do this, but when you allow special exceptions, it opens up the possibility of someone doing this and screws up the integrity of this League.

#10 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 August 2006 - 09:14 PM

View Postjayboogie, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 10:02 AM, said:

That's kind of a naive point of view. The fact of the matter is when money is on the line, people will sometimes lie, cheat and steal in order to get it. Maybe you haven't personally experienced this, but I know of people who have cheated in bigger games and people who have cheated playing $5 buyin home game tournaments. People will do things out of their normal character sometimes when there is money on the line. Obviously I'm not saying anyone would do this, but when you allow special exceptions, it opens up the possibility of someone doing this and screws up the integrity of this League.
I will agree with this statement if you can come up with one reasonable scenario where a team could cheat because Daniel and Sleuthis allowied the cigar lovers into the freeroll

#11 jayboogie

jayboogie

    Poker Forum Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,493 posts
  • Location:Toronto

Posted 02 August 2006 - 09:27 PM

View PostGrinderMJ, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 1:14 AM, said:

I will agree with this statement if you can come up with one reasonable scenario where a team could cheat because Daniel and Sleuthis allowied the cigar lovers into the freeroll
Another team can just lie about their reason for defaulting if it becomes allowed under certain situations without penalty or a lesser one. Who's to judge whether that particular team is lying or not when a team blames an emergency for missing a game? Teams which default will just point to Cigar Lovers being given a special exemption and reason that they should be given the same treatment.

#12 GrinderMJ

GrinderMJ

    Original

  • Members
  • 7,525 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 August 2006 - 09:42 PM

View Postjayboogie, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 10:27 AM, said:

Another team can just lie about their reason for defaulting if it becomes allowed under certain situations without penalty or a lesser one. Who's to judge whether that particular team is lying or not when a team blames an emergency for missing a game? Teams which default will just point to Cigar Lovers being given a special exemption and reason that they should be given the same treatment.
Meh, I don't really feel like arguing about this anymore. You are right in a sense that this could happen, my thoughts have always been that this won't happen. It's still up to Sleuthis and Daniel and they have to run the league, so they can do what they please.

#13 XX44466XX

XX44466XX

    I RUFF POKAH!

  • Members
  • 3,598 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:My Home AND Office
  • Interests:Poker & Boobies & Ninjewtsu
  • Favorite Poker Game:NL HE

Posted 03 August 2006 - 12:56 AM

It's a crappy situation.Show one, show all.
"Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination."

I think Oscar Wilde was talking about poker.

It's All Fours And Sixes

#14 Balloon guy

Balloon guy

    Respect my Raises!!!!!!

  • Members
  • 23,025 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:So Cal
  • Interests:Cigars, Flying, Golf, Bible
  • Favorite Poker Game:Golf

Posted 03 August 2006 - 03:47 AM

I just got off the ship and am still in Barcelona. Yea the end sucked, but I am not one to ask for special treatment. I am cool with taking my chances the normal way for next season. Either way I am sure the secret tapes will continue to come to me and jayboogie will be wearing a dress again. And Grinder will never suffer from the secret tapes. just saying. HOWEVER, The rules clearly state that the home team is to make the game 30 minutes before the match, and give the opposing team 30 minutes to show. Rhinestone didnīt show up until 29 minutes AFTER the schedualed start time, which means he was the one that broke the rules first. Had No_Neck showed up on time and had no game or sign of rhinestone, then he would have won the default.Instead No_Neck was fighting for his life, after a vicious beating by a gang of possible terrorist. No_Neck knew that this game wass important, but he also knows that unless someone stands up to these terrorist, then the American way of life will go away like foxwood proīs chances of making bail after his DUI accident with the patrol car.I am all for the rules, but I will not stand here and let you people bad mouth the United States of America.Gentlemen!So give us our freeroll and say yes to truth, justice, and more secret tapes!
I use my cigar smoke as idiot repellent

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” ― George Orwell

#15 Figger

Figger

    Searchin for my lost shaker of salt

  • Members
  • 1,359 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sarasota, FL
  • Interests:At my age? Breathing!
  • Favorite Poker Game:Up Your Giggy!

Posted 03 August 2006 - 04:50 AM

View Postjayboogie, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 1:02 AM, said:

That's kind of a naive point of view. The fact of the matter is when money is on the line, people will sometimes lie, cheat and steal in order to get it. Maybe you haven't personally experienced this, but I know of people who have cheated in bigger games and people who have cheated playing $5 buyin home game tournaments. People will do things out of their normal character sometimes when there is money on the line. Obviously I'm not saying anyone would do this, but when you allow special exceptions, it opens up the possibility of someone doing this and screws up the integrity of this League.
Ya, but we're not talking about them getting a make-up match and a chance to get into the playoffs, we're talking about entrance into a post season freeroll for the teams that didn't make the playoffs. What the Hell is the prize in the freeroll that would make it so consequential that people would begin to lie, cheat and steal and make up tragic events as excuses?Who, my friend, is being naive?
A friend in need....Is a Pest !

#16 Royal_Tour

Royal_Tour

    Sherlock Holmes of butt sex

  • Members
  • 14,322 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:12 AM

View PostFigger, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 5:50 AM, said:

Ya, but we're not talking about them getting a make-up match and a chance to get into the playoffs, we're talking about entrance into a post season freeroll for the teams that didn't make the playoffs. What the Hell is the prize in the freeroll that would make it so consequential that people would begin to lie, cheat and steal and make up tragic events as excuses?Who, my friend, is being naive?
Umm, well i'm no scientist, or scientologist.... But, i do believe that the reward of 2 teams free entry into next year's is pretty decent.i'd say thats 1k in prizes no??



#17 fleung22

fleung22

    PokerStars Global Events Rep (PokerStars Macau)

  • Members
  • 6,997 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver-->Toronto-->Macau

Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:32 AM

View PostGrinderMJ, on Wednesday, August 2nd, 2006, 8:44 PM, said:

Do you honestly think people are going to start making up tragic events for why they missed a game?
I have organized many golf and poker events and people who I thought would never lie and cheat have made a fool out of me. The first time I thought it was an isolated incident and I sounded just like you GrinderMJ. I KNOW you've got to be young to even ask this question.A so called "friend" of mine was caught cheating in a game where you couldn't possibly lose more than $50...50 crummy dollars!!!So my answer is YES...people will lie and cheat. Outside of some of you high rollers out there this cash can mean a lot and the freeroll comes with a $500 value prize. That isn't a peanut.GrinderMJ, your heart is in the right place but Sleuth is just following the cruel truth about sports. It's not easy being the commish.


#18 Balloon guy

Balloon guy

    Respect my Raises!!!!!!

  • Members
  • 23,025 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:So Cal
  • Interests:Cigars, Flying, Golf, Bible
  • Favorite Poker Game:Golf

Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:34 AM

View PostRoyal_Tour, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 6:12 AM, said:

Umm, well i'm no scientist, or scientologist.... But, i do believe that the reward of 2 teams free entry into next year's is pretty decent.i'd say thats 1k in prizes no??
I thought it was just getting a spot, we still have to pay. If itīs really a true freeroll for next year than I will get a lawyer. Anyone know Andy Blochīs number?
I use my cigar smoke as idiot repellent

“Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” ― George Orwell

#19 Royal_Tour

Royal_Tour

    Sherlock Holmes of butt sex

  • Members
  • 14,322 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 03 August 2006 - 05:56 AM

View PostBalloon guy, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 6:34 AM, said:

I thought it was just getting a spot, we still have to pay. If itīs really a true freeroll for next year than I will get a lawyer. Anyone know Andy Blochīs number?
a spot???everyone knew perfect attendance guaranteed you a spot



#20 Yoda

Yoda

    FCP Superstars Champion, Jedi Master & Lesbian Connoisseur

  • Members
  • 5,822 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 03 August 2006 - 09:22 AM

View PostRoyal_Tour, on Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, 9:56 AM, said:

a spot???everyone knew perfect attendance guaranteed you a spot
A spot that you still have to pay for...I don't remember anything about free


[15:06] <Jan99> go J E T S




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users