river_me_this 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Share Posted July 14, 2010 ok so im the essence of a poor bankroll management player and because of that i have obviously struggled hardcore with building any sort of a roll. with many of the games around me being 1/2 and higher i decided i wanted to try something new. so the plan is to deposit $250 on starts and start out by play 25nl games probably two at a time. my goal would be to log in hours everyday and at the end of the week, month, etc show a nice profit. now my question is does this sound like "ok" money management or should I start playing smaller stakes like 10nl or stay at 25nl and only single table? any input would be greatly appreciated. thanks. Link to post Share on other sites
Shark527 0 Posted July 14, 2010 Share Posted July 14, 2010 Since your starting something brand new, I would drop a limit and play the 10nl for a little while until your comfortable enough to start playing 25nl more regularly. Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted July 14, 2010 Share Posted July 14, 2010 Like Shark said, I recommend starting at $10 NL with that roll, especially if this is your first time trying to two-table. Link to post Share on other sites
rrumsey 0 Posted July 15, 2010 Share Posted July 15, 2010 Like Shark said, I recommend starting at $10 NL with that roll, especially if this is your first time trying to two-table.yep. and if you wanna move up and be serious about learning good play, get a cardrunners or deucescracked or pokervt ( i like deucescracked) membership. there is a ton of 25 nl vids so once you have the roll assuming you watch and learn from the vids you should be able to never have to move down hopefully Link to post Share on other sites
river_me_this 0 Posted July 15, 2010 Author Share Posted July 15, 2010 ok thanks. I think ill start out at 10nl then once i get comfortable with playing daily and turning a profit ill start moving up. Also, i was thinking about doing 6 max instead of full ring any thoughts on that? Link to post Share on other sites
rrumsey 0 Posted July 15, 2010 Share Posted July 15, 2010 ppllaaayyyy 6 max! 9 max is so freaking nitty. Link to post Share on other sites
Merby 3 Posted July 15, 2010 Share Posted July 15, 2010 ppllaaayyyy 6 max! 9 max is so freaking nitty.Meh, he should play whichever one suits his comfort zone best. Link to post Share on other sites
RakeMyBlind 0 Posted July 15, 2010 Share Posted July 15, 2010 ppllaaayyyy 6 max! 9 max is so freaking nitty.If it's so nitty, couldn't you take advantage of that? Or I should say shouldn't you take advantage of that! Link to post Share on other sites
river_me_this 0 Posted July 16, 2010 Author Share Posted July 16, 2010 well i did deposit the 250 and my first session i two tabled 6max and of course lost 50 and just finished up a 4 tabling session full ring and made it all back so im prob going to stick with the full ring for now. Link to post Share on other sites
rrumsey 0 Posted July 16, 2010 Share Posted July 16, 2010 If it's so nitty, couldn't you take advantage of that? Or I should say shouldn't you take advantage of that!yes, but then i would have to play a much more aggro variant style. i would rather be in 6 max personally to stay in pots with the same people more often to exploit them more. more times you are in pots with the same weaker villain the better imo. valid point thou. Link to post Share on other sites
Danege 1 Posted July 17, 2010 Share Posted July 17, 2010 i would rather be in 6 max personally to stay in pots with the same people more often to exploit them more. more times you are in pots with the same weaker villain the better imo. valid point thou.This assumes that OP is a winning player, and can exploit weaker players, which probably isn't true here. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now