Jump to content

How Bad Did I Play This Hand?


Recommended Posts

Right off the top I am willing to admit I made at least one mistake in this hand, but I'm trying to convince myself my final decision wasn't horrible. Any thoughts, including calling me the worst player ever, would be welcome.Background:1) On the bubble2) Started hand with 24BB. Avg stack probably about 16BB.3) In position agains villain.4) AJs in the holeA little more info:1) The villain was on a serious rush (4 double ups in the last 30 minutes) and now had more chips than me, the previous chip leader at the table).2) Two of his rush dubble ups were achieved by sucking out on me and playing some fairly questionable hands.3) A min cash was irrelevent and there were about 15 players to go through till real money could be won.The hand:1) Villain limps late and I raise 2.5BB w/ AJs.2) Villain Reraises to 10BB and I call3) Villian shoves all in ~20BB in the dark4) Flop is A, rag, rag rainbow.5) Villain starts giving speeches. I tank for an etermity and eventually call all in.6) Villain turns over AA and I bubble :(My Analysis:1) I really felt like there was no way the villain had a big Ace when he reraised preflop. First off, he had been raising with Ax all day (why would he all of a sudden limp late reraise when the blinds got so big?). I thought he had a pair and given the limp raise, could have any pair between 88 and AA. My call with AJ was probably what I regret most, as I was likely in a coin flip situation at best.2) The villain's shove in the dark and speeches screemed AA, so while I eventally called, his tactics weren't what did it. I pretty much put him on AA or KK at that point. It was a classic, I'm either dead or way ahead situation.I finally decided that, while he could have AA, the chances of me flopping top pair and him flopping top set were remote enough to push me towards believing he had KK.Additional thoughts:1) I didn't really care about bubbling. In fact, one of the things I considered was that a double up at that point would put me in good position to make a run at one of the top payouts while a fold after the flop would cause me to have to limp into the money and hope to win some races.2) LIke I said my main regret is the call pre-flop, where it was pretty unlikley that I was in any sort of dominating posiiton and could have easily been dominated (as the case turned out to be). I think the call was mostly a result of my annoyance with this particualr player and his recent run of good luck against me.3) While folding after the flop would certainly have been the safe play (especially if I were wrong about him not having AK or AQ), I'm trying to convince myself my all-in call wasn't the worst play ever. If I really cared about cashing, I would have folded and moved on to the next hand, but that wan't my primary concern.Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Willard. I aim to amaze, though I'm not quite sure what you really think of my explanation. Given your post and profile info, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you aren't being sincere. But who knows, my reading skills haven't been 100% accurate recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a guy goes on a rush I always try to control my 'revenge' desire cuz he is very due to have a real hand in there sometime and a limp almost always signals trouble from these types. Although the raise was fairly standard and not really knowing how the suck-out hands were played out, it was probably not the best idea to call here with AJ, even suited AJ. You are either folding or shoving and probably folding in most cases.The dark bet and speeches are clasic tells and it would really take a gem of a guy to reverse tell you here especially after a couple of suck-outs ... he has to know you are going to try to get back at him. He has KK, QQ at worst and actually had better ... AA, AK or AQ. Tough to let him 'run' you over, but with no back-door options from this Flop .. it's a fold, even with top pair, and you move along just below average while trying to pick on someone else hope for a table break.I don't understand the rush to gain chips, you were looking at plenty of other opportunities to steal or have a better spot to work with ... I think the thought process you had is fine during the early stages of a tournament ... chip up or chip out ... but you are not going to win a tournament at the bubble tangling with another big stack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willard (donk4life) I have stated that the pre-flop call was not good, though easy or hard did not play into it. I certainly didn't think I was ahead. I'm not sure what was comical about my post-flop analysis. There was basically one hand that I thought he could have that had me beat and it was very unlikely from a mathematical standpoint that he had that hand.Answer20, I wasn't so much in a rush to gain chips, but after the bad pre-flop call I was left in a position where basically any future play would require me to commit to go all in at some point in the future hand. In retrospect, an all-in pre flop would have been a better play, though the result would have been the same. Either way, once the flop came the situation was completly polarized. I basically felt I was either way ahead or way behind. I would have been absolutely shocked to see him turn over AQ or AK. While his line with AA was unconventional, it would have been borderline insane to do what he did with AK or AQ. The speeches etc might be a classic tell, but this was a fairly odd player making odd moves. I chose to ignore his behavior since he was capable of doing anything and focused on the math. It was just one of those situations where an unlikely occurence came back to bite me. Of course, this is an example of the sort of trouble you can get into when making a bad pre-flop call. If he had turned over KK, which was just as likely from a line of play standpoint and more likely from a mathematical standpoint, then I'd have a nice story about how a loose pre-flop call turned into a monster pot and a really big stack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he limped/rr pre I take him off of speculative hands and weaker ranges immediately (Especially with a rr of half your stack---insta fold there!!!) and put him on big pocket pairs and AK. Hell, I'm folding if he's holding napkins at that point if I'm just holding a weak drawing hand like A/broadway. Matter of fact he probably doesn't want to play AK oop anway so close to a bubble and would more than likely raise as opposed to limp in, so it's AA, KK and possibly queens at the very least that he or anyone would limp in with I would think. What was the one mistake you thought you made? I have to say it was playing AJ like its the nuts from the get go...which is a very horrible starting hand imo. Live and learn though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't call off half your stack preflop ....ever? You probably could with aces in some spots against mulitple willards idiots but that situation is extremely rare. Get it in or fold preflop with AJs. Postflop isn't interesting since you should never ever be in this spot.I think you should probably be folding preflop against 95%, possibly 99%+ of villains. Limp r/r for half of his stack is laughably strong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments, Highwaystar. Just to be accurate, his pre-flop RR was for about 1/4 of his stack and my pre-flop call was for roughly 1/3 of my stack, though I suppose that doesn't make a tremendous amount of difference. I was certainly commiting too many chips with a fairly weak starting hand. I have to disagree with you, though regarding the post flop decision. I think that's a very interesting spot, regardless of how it was arrived at. If all this hand were about was whether or not I should have made the pre-flop call, then I wouldn't have posted about it, since that is fairly straightforward. Just because a fairly bad play led to a tough decision doesn't mean that tough decision insn't interesting.Thanks as well, bat. My obvious mistake was calling pre-flop, and I think everyone agrees. And once he performed his little show I was certain he had a big pair (AA or KK). I ruled out QQ for the most part since I thouight he would play that like AK and I was fairly certain he didn't have that. Of course, QQ is no different than KK in this situation, so it didn't really make a big difference in my thinking.I would like to get people's thoughts on the post-flop decision, since that is where I think this hand becomes interesting. If cashing really mattered, then the safe and prudent play would have been to fold post-flop and I wouldn't be posting it here. After all, sometimes it is wise to fold KK, or perhaps even AA pre-flop when on the bouble, depending on your situation, so the precarious position I found myself in certainly didn't warrant a call if cashing were paramount. But everyone seems to agree that the villain either had AA or KK in this situation. I had KK crushed, and was obviously dead to AA. Folding meant I was defintely still in the tournament, and who know what would happen, but I would be in a very weak position to finish in the top 3 or 4. And of course, folding may have also meant I was folding by far the best hand which would have been pretty awful in that spot. This is not to say you should never be willing to fold the best hand, but this particular spot would have been a very bad one to do so.As a little side commentary. I have obviously stated that cashing was irrelevant and this played a great dea into my decision. I do not want to make it seem like cashing is not good. Obviously making money as opposed to not making money is a good thing. However, I think cashing is a bit overrrated in modern MT live tournaments, which is pretty much what I play exclusively. The way that TDs have structured payouts (paying more than 10% of fields, really flattening out the tail end of the payouts and paying only ~1.5x buy-in for min-cashes) in order to appeal to casual players makes it so you really have to go deep from time to time in order to get the ROI from these tournaments. Having a tremendous cash rate, even something as large as 20% isn't going to get it done unless you have a number of top 1% or 2% finishes. In certain situations where the payout structure is very good, even for min-cashes, or if I haven't cahsed in a while, I will defineitly focus on cashing and play very conservatively on the bubble in order to accomplish that. If this particular example were such a case, I would never have made the post-flop call. But in this case, you really needed to finish in the top 3 or 4 in order to make good money and at the moment I felt that a double up or go home strategy, even on the bubble was worth the risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to your initial post, preflop around 10/30 = 1/3 of the villains stack went in and 10/24 = ~2/5 of your stack. If those fractions are lower then they have to be a lot lower to even consider seeing a flop with AJ, even then it probably isn't wise.Postflop just isn't interesting with these stacks. You're in a position you should never be in and you have top pair. Don't fold, bubble or no bubble. If you have a much much deeper stack then there would be more to it, but that would be a completely different hand.Also don't fold KK (or AA) on a bubble unless it's the most absurd chip stack/payout distribution ever, a satellite, or there is a cold 5 bet before you act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though you said you weren't worried about the bubble. You did mention number one that you were on the bubble. Bubbling sucks and can be easily avoided especially in a turbo which is what this sounds like. Limp pre against the crazy insane guy. Obv he's going to go nuts anyway and he'll still probably go nuts post. So try and flop something great by limping and get him to hang himself or fold because at 16bb avg stack the bubble is popping in no time. Looks like a good spot to mirror really fast. :club: Also if you elect to raise in posish, make it like 2.1-2.2x and fold to a 3bet. Esp for half your stack. Flip after the bubble if it is a flip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Highwaystar, the preflop call I made was for 7.5BB more, which is where I get the 1/3 of my stack call.TrueAce13... you are Willard, if pokerstars is accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a pretty easy fold PF. And if you do think he is weak, just jam PF. so it goes fold>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jam>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>callcalling is the worst option b/c what are you doing on bricked boards? are you just going to fold after putting such a large percentage of your stack in. Listen to what donk and highway say. They are really, really smart and good at poker

Link to post
Share on other sites
donk4life... then why are you commenting? Surely you have better things to do with your time?
I'm commenting because you posted it. There's not much in the way of strat on this forum anymore so you have to take advantage of what's there.
Link to post
Share on other sites

donk4life, I was having trouble understanding your post..."You called off half your stack pre and then hit top pair on the flop, don't fold. The hand isn't any more interesting you Willard."I think its because the word "Willard" is being thrown around in odd contexts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is one of those hands where you just dig it in a holeBy your analysis sounds like your abit tilty when the hand occurred due to bad beats from the villain which may have clouded your judgement through out the hand.Pre-flop calling in that spot is the worst thing to do in my view. There isn't enough information on the villain to assess the villain's hand range accurately, his hand is so polarized in that he can only have the nuts (AA) or nothing pre-flop, If you thought his hand range consisted of pocket pairs ranging from 88-AA and were planning on calling why not jam pre flop if you thought his hand range consisted of <10s?By jaming preflop we have decent 50% equity against 88-10s but if you assume 88-10s is in his range i can only imagine he could be doing this with a wider range possibly 66+ maybe even 22+ so you actually have a decent amount of equity to jam preflop against this range about 60% against his range in this spot assuming his only doing this with only pocket pairs 22+. but we are in terrible spot against his other 40%, 30% equity vs JJ-KK and virtually no equity vs AA. Basically in this spot if you were planning to go with your hand and thought your opponent had a marginal holding jam pre. pre-flop: Nice raise size.. but with AJs in this spot.. Personally id fold to the big re raise.. you can pick better spots to get your money in good.. especially in tournaments where our chips are so valuable we just can't afford to make speculative calls with large chunks of our stack, a high variance game will only get us so far in tournaments.Post-flop: Id still like a fold in this spot with 14bb remaining we still have enough bbs to play with to make the money and grind our stack back. With your analysis of the hand its pretty obvious from the physical tells and also his bet sizing he has AA and he can only have AA in this spot.. from what i concluded in your analysis the villain had been playing pretty standard through out the tournament and for him to make a move like this with anything less then AA is vertually impossible especially on the money bubble.Hope some of that stuff was benefitual for you :club:~Ank~

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your thoughts, Ank. Again, I agree the pre-flop call was foolish. My personal style is not to go all in in that pre-flop situation, so that never even occurred to me, though it would have been the better of two less than ideal options. The best play would obviously have been to fold.As for the post flop, I'm not sure i am in 100% agreement with you. The fellow had not been playing standard, solid poker, at least not in his run-up from seriously short-stacked to one of the chip leaders. He was playing some unconventional hands and getting lucky. His play in this particular hand with AA was pretty awful (IMO) as well, if you think about it. He was taking maximum risk and making moves that, without a bad play from his opponent, would normally net him minimum value on his monster hand. He happened to get a magical flop for the situation. Had he not gone all-in blind, this would have been a much easier fold post-flop, even if he open shoved after the flop, because then AK or AQ would fall into his range.Anyhow, you mentioned that you think he could only have AA in this situation. I agree with you that his tells and blind all-in certainly pointed to that and the fact that he DID have AA also supports the proposition. But I'm not sure why you can completely discount two factors.1) the chance that he had KK in this situation and would play it the same2) the fact that him having AA was far more unlikely from a statistical standpoint.How many times have you ever flopped the second nuts, or something that you could reasonably assume to tbe beaten by only one hand? I would assume that in the vast majority of these instances, you lost a lot of chips. Now, maybe in a traditional bubble situation, the better play is to never call all-in unless you have the nuts. But in my mind, this wasn't a traditional bubble situation. In my mind, the real bubble was about 12 spots away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

donk, I hope your contributions in the real world are move valuable that what you are bringing to this conversation. I suppose it would be hard for them not to be, but who knows?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...