Jump to content

PokerMirate

Members
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About PokerMirate

  • Rank
    Poker Forum Newbie
  • Birthday 05/05/1983

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Probably studying somewhere
  • Interests
    Movies, Music, Random fun things, getting drunk, making money, talkin to the ladies.
  1. you were rapped by them? Is that like being roasted, but with a hip-hop flavor?
  2. OMG, that is incredible. I hope you reported this to Pokerstars, there must be a bug in their randomizer.
  3. The more I think about it the more I believe that ZJ will attempt another apology in another couple months as this attempt doesn't seem to be holding much water.He does not owe anybody on here or anywhere else an apology, etc., but to pretend to apologize is just kinda sad. Someone who is truly apologetic is usually open to answering questions about the matter so people will get over it and it can be put behind him. He has shown none of this from his responses on here (if its not a gimmick account) and 2+2. He has taken the attitude of, "I apologized, now leave me alone." This is not an attitu
  4. How did I say anything that resembles a claim like that? You said that everyone in a tourney had the exact same odds to win as everyone else. Joe Blow is 1/100, Ivey is 1/100, etc. Never once did I even touch on that topic, you may need to work on your reading comprehension skills.But as long as you bring it up, no it would not be alright. Because, again, it gives him an advantage over other player. If you do not see it, im afraid you never will.
  5. If poker was pure luck this would be correct, but there is also skill involved which, yet again, mean you are wrong. If you enter a tournament and Hellmuth enter a tourney, each of you does not have the same chance of winning. He is a more skilled player than you and therefore has a better shot. Yes, you each have the same odds of recieving AA, KK, etc., but he is better at poker than you, which means he will probably extract more money from his winning hands and lose less on his losing hands. This does not guarantee he will finish better than you, but it means he has a better shot to. Face it
  6. It is very nice that you couch your outrageous claim with a statement demanding others to not respond to it so you can't be proven wrong, which there is no doubt you are. Also, your argument is pretty pathetic as it does not matter how many other people would or wouldn't do it, as either way it is wrong, the amount of people participating in the action does not change whether it is against the rules. What ir does bring up is an nice insight into peoples true morals and ethics. the idea of whether someone would commit the perfect murder.The man broke the TOS, what they did was within their righ
  7. This just seems like a more eloquent version of the hastily made posts that he made in response to the incident a few months ago. However, I am glad that in getting caught he realized that cheating is unethical. But I am curious if he no longer believes that any advantage was negated if he opened up more tables if he ended up at the same table as one of his other identities in a tourney. If he no longer does than why did he say it in the first place?Also, found it interesting that he doesn't actually apologize for cheating, just for letting people down. Unless I missed it somewhere in the midd
  8. Yeah they've really ruined the whole poker boom thing thus far and really screwed over everyone by producing a product that has caused everyone and there mother to want to play poker and not only play poker, but throw down 10k in dead money in their tournies.WPT = idiots for sure
  9. In todays episode:guy calls (maybe raises, but its unimportant), folds around to button with KQ who says, "I call and raise."I guess Matt Savage or anyone else that is a part of the show has heard of a string bet.
  10. I dont get why people post bad beats? You want sympathy or tp hear how bad the other person played or what? theyaren't interesting and just boil down to, "Someone called with a worse hand and beat me. "Boo hoo. eventually figure it out that you should be very happy when you have players who are prone to suckout at your table because it means they are continually puting themselves in bad position.
  11. Hope you didn't pay too much, depending on how much you paid I have a feeling you could have gotten better chips for about the same price. Not what I like, but at least you like them.
  12. Why dont you include what you said?
  13. For one how can you possibly guess that? Kido would play such a large range of hands, many of which are better than Teds, the same way he played the A5 that it is crazy to say Ted knew Kido had a weaker Ace.Even if somehow he knew Kido had a weaker Ace, what if the kicker had paired the flop? Then you really screwed yourself. He was risking roughly $100k in real money, the bump in gauaranteed money, that his A9 was better than Kidos hand. Without knowing the results it is better to keep Bell in.
  14. If you want to look like a WPT wannabe go for it, especially if you are playing $1/2
  15. oops, my mistake, thanks for the correction.Point still stands though. A donkey is a term for someone who plays poorly, not a label for people who call with top pair, OESD, etc. Also even if you do bet out, if you are not betting enough, it is not necessarily incorrect for them to call with certain draws
×
×
  • Create New...