345 replies to this topic

[Mills]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:08 AM, said:

Evolution was a theory founded with bad data, faith in untrue science

You talk about truth and then you post garbage like this? ANy evidence to back this up? any at all?

[Mills]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:08 AM, said:

Well you delved deep in your argument trove and dug up a good rebuttal.

Since when do assinine statements require detailed rebuttles?

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:13 AM, said:

then what was your point in posting that pastuer was skeptical of evolution/natural selection?

He wasn't skeptical, he proved it wrong by the very heart of his work on biology.Like begets like, that is a universal law that the Bible first said and Pasteur used to arrive at his scientific findings that gave us one of the central tenets of today's medicine.And the difference in Pasteur's work and Darwin is that Pasteur used the Bible as true and has helped mankind by an amount hat is probably incalculable, wheres Darwin has only given us Eugenics and nazism.

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:17 AM, said:

Since when do assinine statements require detailed rebuttles?

I know, but I thought you might be able to learn so that's why I am doing it...

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:16 AM, said:

You talk about truth and then you post garbage like this? ANy evidence to back this up? any at all?

Well, there is the fact that evolution isn't true.That and most evolutionist are homos..

[Mills]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:18 AM, said:

He wasn't skeptical, he proved it wrong by the very heart of his work on biology.

I have a fun new game... everytime you post something im simply going to type"Evidence"?more often than not this will probably end said line of discussion

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:24 AM, said:

I have a fun new game... everytime you post something im simply going to type"Evidence"?more often than not this will probably end said line of discussion

I bet you won't

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:18 AM, said:

He wasn't skeptical, he proved it wrong by the very heart of his work on biology.Like begets like, that is a universal law that the Bible first said and Pasteur used to arrive at his scientific findings that gave us one of the central tenets of today's medicine.

So.. now you don't believe that there is variability in reproduction? Are all your kids clones of you? That is a scary thought.

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:28 AM, said:

So.. now you don't believe that there is variability in reproduction? Are all your kids clones of you? That is a scary thought.

Like means exact?I guess I was wrong then

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:32 AM, said:

I guess I was wrong then

As usual. Natural selection requires variability. That's what we have in reproduction.

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:24 AM, said:

I have a fun new game... everytime you post something im simply going to type"Evidence"?more often than not this will probably end said line of discussion

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:26 AM, said:

I bet you won't

Quote

9:32 AM' post='3276584']Like means exact?I guess I was wrong then

2 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)2 Members: Balloon guy, MillsTen minutes later and still no "Evidence?"See?I was right about that also

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:42 AM, said:

As usual. Natural selection requires variability. That's what we have in reproduction.

The idea that there are only two theories here: one that evolution is true, and the other that not believing in evolution means that you can't believe in adaptation in the species, is why you are confused.It is possible to believe that a dog can adapt, that a horse can be bred to be faster, and that humans have differences without believing in a crocaduck.DUCY?

[Mills]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:49 AM, said:

is why you are confused.DUCY?

LOL at arguing science with a scientist

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:24 AM, said:

I have a fun new game... everytime you post something im simply going to type"Evidence"?more often than not this will probably end said line of discussion

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:53 AM, said:

LOL at arguing science with a scientist

LOL at having the attention span of a piece of cheese.

[vbnautilus]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 9:49 AM, said:

The idea that there are only two theories here: one that evolution is true, and the other that not believing in evolution means that you can't believe in adaptation in the species, is why you are confused.It is possible to believe that a dog can adapt, that a horse can be bred to be faster, and that humans have differences without believing in a crocaduck.

I'm familiar with your misunderstanding about what a species is, yes.

[Balloon guy]

vbnautilus, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 10:06 AM, said:

I'm familiar with your misunderstanding about what a species is, yes.

Says the guy in the thread about how vestigial organs are proof of evolution.And I'm familiar with your Jedi mind tricks...they won't work on me.

[Mills]

Balloon guy, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 10:03 AM, said:

LOL at having the attention span of a piece of cheese.

among the concepts you don't understand, might want to add "hyperbole" to the list

[Balloon guy]

Mills, on Friday, January 15th, 2010, 10:25 AM, said:

among the concepts you don't understand, might want to add "hyperbole" to the list

I'll put it right under: "Why can't evolutionist think a thought through to any conclusion that agree with the laws of logic"

[Mills]

evidence?

[Jeepster80125]

lol