$25 nl 6 maxstacks are all the usual, I have max and villains cover or are close. SB has played kind of weak/tightish, probably like 30/10/1.5, but that's only an approximation - we've played probably 100 hands together.Hero is dealt [ 8 :diamond: 9 :club: ]three limpersSB completesHero checksFlop [8 :club: 9 :spade: T :heart: ]($1.25)SB bets $1Hero raises to $53 foldsSB raises to $14Hero foldsWhat do you do in this spot? I mean it looks like a standard fold. OTF you have to raise, correct, but then it seems like you're only receiving further action from better two-pair combos, sets, or straights. I guess it's just one of those hands where you have to punish passive draws / top pair and fold to serious resistance.
Bottom Two
Started by trystero, Oct 06 2008 05:01 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 06 October 2008 - 05:01 PM
#2
Posted 06 October 2008 - 07:02 PM
trystero, on Monday, October 6th, 2008, 5:01 PM, said:
$25 nl 6 maxstacks are all the usual, I have max and villains cover or are close. SB has played kind of weak/tightish, probably like 30/10/1.5, but that's only an approximation - we've played probably 100 hands together.Hero is dealt [ 8 :diamond: 9 :club: ]three limpersSB completesHero checksFlop [8 :club: 9 :spade: T :heart: ]($1.25)SB bets $1Hero raises to $53 foldsSB raises to $14Hero foldsWhat do you do in this spot? I mean it looks like a standard fold. OTF you have to raise, correct, but then it seems like you're only receiving further action from better two-pair combos, sets, or straights. I guess it's just one of those hands where you have to punish passive draws / top pair and fold to serious resistance.
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling because he knows that he is no longer the worst President of the modern era
#3
Posted 07 October 2008 - 04:48 AM
trystero, on Monday, October 6th, 2008, 9:01 PM, said:
$25 nl 6 maxstacks are all the usual, I have max and villains cover or are close. SB has played kind of weak/tightish, probably like 30/10/1.5, but that's only an approximation - we've played probably 100 hands together.Hero is dealt [ 8 :diamond: 9 :club: ]three limpersSB completesHero checksFlop [8 :club: 9 :spade: T :heart: ]($1.25)SB bets $1Hero raises to $53 foldsSB raises to $14Hero foldsWhat do you do in this spot? I mean it looks like a standard fold. OTF you have to raise, correct, but then it seems like you're only receiving further action from better two-pair combos, sets, or straights. I guess it's just one of those hands where you have to punish passive draws / top pair and fold to serious resistance.
Give me a paper and pen so I can write about my life of sin. A couple bottles of gin in case I don't get in.
-2Pac
-2Pac
#4
Posted 07 October 2008 - 09:17 AM
Just say NO to bottom 2, in this situation anyway.
#5
Posted 07 October 2008 - 09:19 AM
Fold...this is a limped pot and 67, J7, JQ are all extremely possible options for villain here. Also, given villains re-raise to just under 3 times your flop raise, i feel like he is asking you to call with anything lucrative here. As mtdesmoines said as well: you need to know something about villain to play this hand and after playing about 100 hands together you should be forming a decent idea of what type of player you believe him to be.
#6
Posted 07 October 2008 - 12:38 PM
Edit: Nevermind.
#7
Posted 07 October 2008 - 12:40 PM
What would you do with TPMK or TPCK here? That's essentially what your bottom two is. If you're going to raise, yeah, it's a fold. Another option is a flat with position on the bettor. Yeah, you may get squeezed by one of the others, but that's okay. I just prefer to play my bottom two carefully here and wait for an equity jump on the turn to re-evaluate.
Seals With Clubs - Bitcoin Poker Room - Easy and Fast Deposits and Cashouts (Open to US)
https://sealswithclu...aff.php?aff=182
https://sealswithclu...aff.php?aff=182
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









