2016 Elections

[Balloon guy 158]

Because Weiner had classified intel on his laptop at his home and office that came from Hillary's unsecured email server?

 

Or because Hillary's aide allowed classified emails to be shadowed on her personal laptop that she shared with her pedophile husband?

 

Or because of the Pizzagate connection?

 

Trying to be clear about why.

[JustDoIt 10]

Matt O'Brien ‏@ObsoleteDogma 8h8 hours ago

Remember, Trump has a mandate because he got 2.8 million fewer votes despite having a hostile power *and* the FBI meddle on his behalf.

 

What is this guy talking about Clinton getting more votes? Trump beat her by a 1.5 million votes.

 

Oh No............................................I forgot to add in the 4.2 million votes Clinton beat Trump by in California which included the 1.5 million vote difference from L.A. County.

 

HMM..............................................Guess the Electoral College is doing what it is supposed to do.

 

hostile power *and* the FBI meddle......................................LOL Mr. O'Brien forgot to add fake news. Yeah totally #FAKESTATEMENT

 

https://theintercept.com/2016/12/09/a-clinton-fan-manufactured-fake-news-that-msnbc-personalities-spread-to-discredit-wikileaks-docs/

[JustDoIt 10]

they both played their part

 

Trump doesn't win without the Comey - Weiner stuff.

 

BS......Obvious you have not done much research on why she lost. Study up and stop being part of the propaganda Echo Chamber.

[FCP Bob 1,312]

BS......Obvious you have not done much research on why she lost. Study up and stop being part of the propaganda Echo Chamber.

 

yup, I've paid no attention to the election at all

 

The election was super close and the difference between there being a President Clinton instead of a President Trump was very small.

 

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 20h20 hours ago

Clinton lost 4 states (FL, MI, WI, PA) by ~1 point. If not for Comey/Russia, she probably wins them all by ~2 points & strategy looks great.

[FCP Bob 1,312]

This is a good article with some historical context to help understand Trump.

 

The Ancient Greeks Warned Us About Donald Trump

[FCP Bob 1,312]

he's bigly smart

 

Somebody pointed out that a narcissict wouldn't want to take intelligence briefings becuase there is no way they can accept being told that they won partly because of help from Russia etc.

 

The HillVerified account

‏@thehill

Trump suggests he doesn't need daily intelligence briefings: "I'm, like, a smart person."

http://hill.cm/PiC0Eg9

[FCP Bob 1,312]

yup, I've paid no attention to the election at all

 

The election was super close and the difference between there being a President Clinton instead of a President Trump was very small.

 

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 20h20 hours ago

Clinton lost 4 states (FL, MI, WI, PA) by ~1 point. If not for Comey/Russia, she probably wins them all by ~2 points & strategy looks great.

 

 

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 30m30 minutes ago

Nate Silver Retweeted Jack Shafer

Comey had a large, measurable impact on the race. Harder to say with Russia/Wikileaks because it was drip-drip-drip. http://53eig.ht/2fvuQNl

 

 

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 22m22 minutes ago

There's more evidence, too: Late-deciding voters broke strongly against Clinton in swing states, enough to cost her MI/WI/PA.

 

[FCP Bob 1,312]

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 20m20 minutes ago

I'll put it like this: Clinton would almost certainly be President-elect if the election had been held on Oct. 27 (day before Comey letter).

[Balloon guy 158]

I was going to suggest that you not quote a person who was consistently wrong about this election, and the World Series Champions, in the same year.

 

 

 

But I know you NEED anything to hold onto to imagine if only Hillary with the best funded and ran campaign had actually won the election instead of losing it pitifully while getting drunk and assaulting her staff.

 

 

Maybe Amazon Prime will do a TV series with an alternate reality where Hillary won the election and an insider didn't release those emails, I mean Russia didn't hack the democrat's emails and truthfully display them for the corrupt phonies that they are.

 

I mean really Bob, my children would try to use the "Who told you" defense when they were caught, like that is some kind of a defense.

 

It would have been much much more effective to just show that the democrats didn't rig their own primaries, feed Hillary questions, and make disparaging remarks about Hispanic voters in their emails, all while calling half the voters "Deplorable" and complain about not being "Up fifty points" in a shrill voice.

 

Collapsing while walking to your van and then lying about the weather didn't help much.

 

Nor did having President Obama stump for you by telling everyone how wonderful he is bring in the votes.

 

But I guess having all the money and a politically savvy team isn't a lock if you act like corrupt politicians for decades.

 

Maybe next time you can put up the next old white Democrat and tell us how racist we all are again.

[Balloon guy 158]

And here is the actual list of foreign countries that tried to influence the US elections:

 

 

 

 

Nothing to see here, no reason at all to worry about these contributors. Because it's an A++++ rating. That spends most of it's charity on private airplanes and salaries.

[JustDoIt 10]

he's bigly smart

 

Somebody pointed out that a narcissict wouldn't want to take intelligence briefings becuase there is no way they can accept being told that they won partly because of help from Russia etc.

 

The HillVerified account

‏@thehill

Trump suggests he doesn't need daily intelligence briefings: "I'm, like, a smart person."

http://hill.cm/PiC0Eg9

There you go again, posting click bait.

 

Total Comment would be nice.

 

"I'm, like, a smart person," the president-elect said during the interview.

"I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that."

 

Nothing there Bob

[JustDoIt 10]

yup, I've paid no attention to the election at all

 

The election was super close and the difference between there being a President Clinton instead of a President Trump was very small.

 

Nate Silver ‏@NateSilver538 20h20 hours ago

Clinton lost 4 states (FL, MI, WI, PA) by ~1 point. If not for Comey/Russia, she probably wins them all by ~2 points & strategy looks great.

 

Great we get a bunch of tweets from Nate Silver joining the Echo Chamber and doing his CYA since he totally blew it this election season.

He is just blowing hot air.

 

At least Larry Sabato has no problem eating Crow.

 

“We were wrong,” Sabato said. “The entire punditry industry, the entire polling industry, the entire analyst industry – and I want to use this opportunity to take my fair share of the blame – we were wrong.”

[Balloon guy 158]

There you go again, posting click bait.

 

Total Comment would be nice.

 

"I'm, like, a smart person," the president-elect said during the interview.

"I don't have to be told the same thing in the same words every single day for the next eight years. Could be eight years — but eight years. I don't need that."

 

Nothing there Bob

 

Wait, you mean context should be applied when a person speaks?

 

This means maybe what people say matters?

 

I'm just glad President Obama attended every single national security briefing.

 

Cause he's not that smart.

[LMDIZZLE 2]

Matt O'Brien ‏@ObsoleteDogma 8h8 hours ago

No big deal, Putin just did everything he could to get Trump elected, and it worked https://www.washingt...litics%2Bnation …

 

 

 

 

Not to bring a little reality to the punch bowl but evidence that American media tried to influence this election towards Clinton is massively abundant. An investigation would take roughly 30 seconds.

 

The CIA, if anything, is pissed that something they have done for decades may have bit them on the ass, and it was done so well that they have no hard evidence and nothing except "Well, somebody didn't tattle on the other side as well."

 

My take on this is simple: so what? The Russians at worst made information available, that's if they even did it. What's the crime? They told us stuff?

 

It's funny how now that it's over the plethora of lies thrown at Trump have gone away. Where are the abused women? Shouldn't more exist? They should be lining up around the block by now.

 

It was all bullshit. The media did way, way more damage with the constant stream of lies. An argument can be made that it should have been an absolute landslide in Trumps direction, had we not been bombarded with constant MSM propoganda.

 

If anything, the CIA should be investigating our own media outlets.

[LMDIZZLE 2]

Yea, glad you told us LMD.

Didn't know it was you.

Glad you are still around

 

 

Very much around. Life update coming.

[Dubey 1,035]

Between BG, Scoog, Justdoit, and Serge.

 

Over/under on how many of them fully believe the Pizzagate Conspiracy theory (Even if they wouldn't admit it here).

 

I'll set the line at 2.5.

 

Probably should be higher since Serge and BG are pretty much locks.

[Balloon guy 158]

*Snap finger*

 

"Look Over Here"

 

"Pizzagate"

 

"Ignore the obvious trouncing of the 'Russians are Coming' fear mongering technique the leftist are trying to pass off."

 

"Ignore the fact they haven't brought it up except as a joke so far"

 

" I know what they think because all leftist know everything about people they've never met"

 

 

"Look over here:, not there"

[JustDoIt 10]

Between BG, Scoog, Justdoit, and Serge.

 

Over/under on how many of them fully believe the Pizzagate Conspiracy theory (Even if they wouldn't admit it here).

 

I'll set the line at 2.5.

 

Probably should be higher since Serge and BG are pretty much locks.

LOL, what the hell are you talking about. Must be when Obama flew Chris Sommers who owns a Pizza Resturant, from St Louis, Missouri, with a suitcase of dough, cheese and pans to to prepare food for the Obamas and their staff. What's confusing is that happened back in April 2009.

 

Yeah count me in I believe this happened back in 2009.

[Balloon guy 158]

Good try, He knows you are a conspiracy theorist who believes everything that is said on Alex Jone's site.

 

Don't try to deny it.

 

He KNOWS

[Dubey 1,035]

(Even if they wouldn't admit it here).

 

I'll set the line at 2.5.

 

 

 

 

definitely over.

[Balloon guy 158]

Turns out Podesta is a russian

 

https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2016/12/podesta-email-spam/

[Fenxis 99]

.yiannopoulos.net

For when the fake news websites aren't "red pill" enough go to a blog

[Dubey 1,035]

Will Jordan ‏@williamjordann · 3h3 hours ago

 

Um, wow...

 

Net favorability of Putin:

 

Democrats

July 2014: -54

Dec 2016: -62

 

Republicans

July 2014: -66

Dec 2016: -10

 

(YouGov/Economist)

 

 

 

further proof that it is easier to rationalize away negative information than it is to change a deeply held belief.

[Balloon guy 158]

.yiannopoulos.net

For when the fake news websites aren't "red pill" enough go to a blog

that quotes and links a New York Times article

 

Fyp

[Fenxis 99]

further proof that it is easier to rationalize away negative information than it is to change a deeply held belief.

 

That's why I hate non-centrist parties. So much issues that deserve proper attention gets twisted into false ideological rationalization.

 

Like the cabinet choices.. given that most nominees have reasons to not like the department they are heading and likely will be hostile I could see the brain drain destroying America's domestic policy for 10s of decades.