beggar04

I didn't pay attention that it was a 4-handed game. I am learning alot just reading this thread. I obviously don't play short-handed limit ever at any stakes.

Being the bad player that I am, I would have called to see if my AQ or KQ was good (yes I might have raised pre-flop with KQ on the button - I told you I'm bad!) Of course I would never be in stakes this high...

Thanks David, I think I understand. The best thing that can happen is everyone folds, the worst is that everyone calls and we have the same or less info as check/call?Now let me ask this... What did we learn on the flop and turn? Is there any card that comes on the river that would be ok for us to lead or call?

Yeah, that makes sense. If we're not going to call this down to the end, don't we want everyone else to fold here? The weakness we've displayed all along just invites people to steal later (doesn't it?)Isn't it better to win a small pot here than to lose a bigger pot later? (be gentle, remember I suck and am trying to learn...)

Newbie alert!I'm sure I'll deserve all kinds of crap for this question, but since I'm bad and want to get better... Why don't we lead the flop here?I think completing the SB is a no-brainer (but I suck, so what do I know). I understand that this isn't a dream flop, because QJ, QK, Q10, 44 (all very likely limp hands IMO) have us crushed. Are we worried about getting called and getting no information and setting ourselves up for more losses later?Similarly after the check around on the turn, would we ever lead the river? (I know the board is even more dangerous now, but it just seems like we

When you call playing Go Fish with your 6 yr. old a "session".

When you open a session of Go Fish with your 6 yr. old by saying, "... I'm all in".