To bad about the big Negs I see, but Limit right I suppose in NL them games don't happen. I'd be into that high of the high stuff but whats your bankroll; infinite right, whats that to play money Hey? I've seen plenty a yocal stack up many a grand a minute in play money. Thorp the author on Blackjack , claims money problems make for worst play so it could actually be easier up on those ranks, more or less the Generals say not much to really lose, sure if you staked the same proportion as the normal you could be in a different ballgame. Just like the big billionaire who has a 50 million dollar house, what is that when you make hundreds a million a year?
cash game results 2005
Started by DanielNegreanu, Mar 28 2005 03:35 PM
106 replies to this topic
#101
Posted 28 August 2005 - 03:38 PM
#102
Posted 20 September 2005 - 02:42 AM
I don't understand who plays this game. It would be idiotic for a billionaire tourist to sit down in such a game as they're throwing their money away but do they still? Also, Daniel im suprised top pros would sit down with the likes of yourself, Ivey, Chip, Doyle, Barry etc. Where are the fish?! With all respect if the top pros such as the ones's i've mentioned sit down together their level of skill is similar so are you not just passing money around to each other over the long run?
#103
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:40 AM
to everyone that says these $ figures are a joke, ..but i bet you can't even make 1/10 of what daniel makes in a month, in 5 years...your the joke.
#104
Posted 14 November 2005 - 02:49 AM
sorry, i know this is an innapropriate place to recall the arcitecture debate from earlier. but read umberto eco's essay "city of robots" regarding the hyper reality of places like las vegas where arcitecture isn't important. what is more important is selling a fake view of reality as a fake because the fake is better then the real and that's what people have come to expect. sorry i posted this here.
#105
Posted 14 November 2005 - 09:22 AM
navybuttons said:
sorry, i know this is an innapropriate place to recall the arcitecture debate from earlier. but read umberto eco's essay "city of robots" regarding the hyper reality of places like las vegas where arcitecture isn't important. what is more important is selling a fake view of reality as a fake because the fake is better then the real and that's what people have come to expect. sorry i posted this here.
#106
Posted 25 December 2005 - 08:57 AM
IF you say so!!
#107
Posted 25 December 2005 - 09:00 AM
ajs510 said:
navybuttons said:
sorry, i know this is an innapropriate place to recall the arcitecture debate from earlier. but read umberto eco's essay "city of robots" regarding the hyper reality of places like las vegas where arcitecture isn't important. what is more important is selling a fake view of reality as a fake because the fake is better then the real and that's what people have come to expect. sorry i posted this here.
Founder and President of SeatsPro Ticket Marketing LLC and SeatsPro.com - Check it out for all your ticket needs!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









