bsabres81

I have only scanned the replies to this, but it seems odd that noone has mentioned the obvious. KJ should have moved in on the flop, if he was sure his opponent was weak, to force A-high or a small pair to fold.

Of course, we have learned that Paul Phillips was not the actual player in this story. Nonetheless, I did some thought on the issue as a whole before scrolling to read extempore's entry. I would be surprised if he accepted the bet anyway. Even against eight sub-par players, a must-win bet probably would not be profitable (as anyone who watched tonight's WPT repeat can attest). I would think his chances were somewhere between 3-1 to 5-2.

Barry G probably had his opponent on AK on the flop, though I believe he thought his opponent caught up and made three aces. He would have to think no one could play AK that strongly into Barry's obvious set, especially on the turn. It seems impossible that someone could misplay their hand this badly. What the hell does he think BG has? K7? 73 of diamonds? BG knows he has at least top two pair here. I do agree with those who say a call is correct on the off chance the German has three sevens.

I took a prop bet on Bodog, Michael Mizrachi -120 against Tuan Le. I know that Mizrachi survived Day 1, though not with the chips he would like. But I can't find any mention of Tuan Le on Cardplayer, or anywhere else I've looked. If anyone knows, please respond.

They should be up at around 11:50 EST.

Ok, I sent you an e-mail with the link.PC76EF is referral code

Ok, I sent you an e-mail with the link.

I'll do it. Do you have AIM?

GT123 wrote, Hopefully.

Anyone who folds this hand in a cash game is an absolute fish. How weak-tight can you be? In a live game where you have a fabulous read on the player, or in a rare tournament situation, this hand is foldable, or at least check-callable. There are a tremendous amount of holdings you could easily be up against that your opponent thinks to be the best hand. The nut flush is a possibility, but so are all the following hands:A 10 (nut flush draw and an open-ended straight draw, a hand that is a favorite against your range of possible hands)A 9 (nut flush draw and top pair, also favored agains

Actually 21 outs with 5 cards to come would be 210% to win according to his formula. The formula he gives is simply a very basic formula to quickly getting an estimate as to the odds. In most cases it is within 1 or 2% in post-flop situations. Evidently it is not applicable to pre-flop odds.

Unless this guy is a very bad player, the only two hands he can have are AK and 10 10. Smooth-calling with AA out of position is a tremendous mistake. It' s also unlikely he called that raise with 66, unless you have been super-aggressive. He simply cannot have AQ if he has a clue how to play. Despite what some have said, you aren't getting the right price if you are up against a set. However, since it is slightly more likely that he has AK, a call is correct here.

Yeah, where ESPN shows the cards it said K9 . Also when someone was all in with 8 8 ESPN said it was 8 8 . No big deal really, but shouldn't be too hard to keep straight.

JackBo3 wrote: Or because winning $16 playing 1/2 wouldn't exactly thrill them.

Finally the right answer:SabaAba wrote: