Jump to content

Surprise! Republicans Shoot Down Women's Right's Bill


Recommended Posts

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/06/20126642611933937.htmlya, that's a party that respects american citizens.....just laughable how they continue to garner so much support...oh wait, this clears that up:"The study’s authors speculated that this dumbing down could be viewed as legislators trying to communicate more effectively with their constituents, which is likely in some cases, but more probably the drop in speaking ability is more directly related to the influence of the anti-intellectual right in the Republican Party. Some of the people who are at the top of this list could be very intelligent, but displaying too much intelligence is a political liability in today’s Republican Party. Just as Mitt Romney is doing in 2012, many Republican politicians are being forced to play dumb in front of the cameras."http://www.politicususa.com/stupid-teabaggers-10-gop-freshman-speak-8th-grade-level.html
Link to post
Share on other sites
vh5e89.gifDid a pro-terrorist, pro-islam poster just complain about a US political party not respecting women enough? Is this a joke?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha.I love people who are sheep who think the title of a bill is what the bill is about.But not as much as I love a hypocrite who defends muslim atrocities decrying the treatment of women in America by republicans.Its like you are the epitome of hypocrisy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTWThe Obama white house has the lowest paid female employees of any recent president.

According to the 2011 annual report on White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary for male employees ($71,000).
As a presidential candidate in 2008, Obama was criticized for paying the women on his campaign staff less than the men, and far less than GOP opponent John McCain paid his female staffers.
Its funny how bad the left is confused about reality
Link to post
Share on other sites
If I were the kind of guy who put quotes in my signature, I would strongly consider going with this one.
It is a good representation of my willingness to put up with people on the left.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how a bill that treats women as children and assumes that wise bureaucrats should stand between women and their voluntary consensual dealings with others can possibly be considered "pro-women".

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bill: You're allowed to talk to others about your salary even if your employer says you can't.H's interpretation: If passed, bureaucrats will stand between women and their voluntary consensual dealings.I admit to only reading a few bullet points about the bill, so I think I must've missed a key point somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...