Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And you would know this how?

It seems like gender-normal white men's lives are so weighed down by the double standards placed on them that it's become pretty much impossible to get through their lives without being accused of mur

that wasn't the only issue though. THe tone of the article, the reaction to finding out she was a transexual, the use of pronouns are pretty offensive to the trans community. Also, Transvestite, is no

I thought this might be about that Grant dude from Survivor and the residual hurt he continues to experience over Rob's heartless and soulless betrayal of this gentle ex-NFL'er...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Klosterman and Gladwell will make the site for me.
I really liked Klosterman's first article.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I found today's Klosterman article to be a bit boring overall, but this paragraph, is fantastic:

If I record Thursday's Mavs-Heat game and wait until Friday morning to watch it, will I be able to avoid discovering that Miami won in overtime? Probably. I could probably avoid hearing the score or knowing that it was an especially thrilling game. But could I avoid hearing that LeBron James scored 85 points? Could I avoid hearing that Dirk had 51 at halftime? Could I keep from learning that the roof of American Airlines Center tragically collapsed? What if Miami never missed a single field goal for the entire second half? What if Mark Cuban grabbed the PA microphone seconds before tip-off and publicly announced he was gay? What if a bear broke into the stadium and started attacking players on the court, forcing Shawn Marion to tackle the bear and break its neck? Is there any chance I could avoid hearing that news before pressing "play" on the DVR remote? No. No way. There's no possible way I could avoid hearing about any of those situations. And — sure — those scenarios are preposterous and implausible. But so was the possibility of an earthquake happening during a World Series game. So was the likelihood of an NBA title game being interrupted by the LAPD slowly chasing a Hall of Fame tailback down the freeway to arrest him for double homicide. So was Monica Seles getting stabbed at the French Open, Reggie Miller scoring eight points in less than nine seconds, and the conclusion of the 1982 Cal-Stanford game. It's difficult to project fictional scenarios that are more oblique and unexpected than the craziest moments from reality. We all understand this. And that understanding is at the core of the human attraction to liveness. We don't crave live sporting events because we need immediacy; we crave them because they represent those (increasingly rare) circumstances in which the entire spectrum of possibility is in play. They're the last scraps of mass society that are totally unfixed.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Klosterman and Gladwell will make the site for me.
As in Malcolm Gladwell? Where does it say he is part of this?nm I see he's a consulting editor. I was looking for him under Columnists.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who doesn't like the layout of the site? It looks like it was made on a free template. But I really like the articles so far

Link to post
Share on other sites
I found today's Klosterman article to be a bit boring overall, but this paragraph, is fantastic:
You didn't read his first article, which is what I was referring to. You are quoting his new article that was just posted last night with Michael Phelps' picture.Look to the right of the main page under "Staring Rotation" to find Klosterman's first article.Also, I need to still get used to the footnotes being on the right hand side of the article. I like it alot, but I need to get used to it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
You didn't read his first article, which is what I was referring to. You are quoting his new article that was just posted last night with Michael Phelps' picture.Look to the right of the main page under "Staring Rotation" to find Klosterman's first article.Also, I need to still get used to the footnotes being on the right hand side of the article. I like it alot, but I need to get used to it.
Yeah, I knew that, My post wasn't a direct reply to yours, more an observation in the same topic (Klosterman). That why I specififed "Today's article".I liked his first article too. In fact, I liked both, I just didn't find the second one as captivating.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Am I the only one who doesn't like the layout of the site? It looks like it was made on a free template. But I really like the articles so far
I like the layout. I hate websites that have too much going on. I'm really enjoying all the articles too. This website seems to adhere to Bill Simmons' philosophy on the 30 for 30 series. Get good people and let them do their thing.Grantland is Doomed Even Before LaunchThis guy doesn't make any sense to me.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I like the layout. I hate websites that have too much going on. I'm really enjoying all the articles too. This website seems to adhere to Bill Simmons' philosophy on the 30 for 30 series. Get good people and let them do their thing.Grantland is Doomed Even Before LaunchThis guy doesn't make any sense to me.
I don't know why he assumes they are getting paid well. Perhaps they all view it as slum-happy fun.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know why he assumes they are getting paid well. Perhaps they all view it as slum-happy fun.
I'm sure they are being paid very well. I think this guy's mistake is in assuming that ESPN and Simmons don't have a solid business plan in place that takes into account things such as, oh, I don't know, operating expenses, including Staff salaries. This isn't some half baked idea that was thrown together overnight. "Ok, we are up and running, so uhhh, anyone want to do some math and figure out if the advertising revenue is going to cover all of our Salaries?" I'm sure Subway and Klondike are paying a tremendous amount to have a large Ad plastered across the screen of, I'm assuming, millions of viewers, daily; Or, hundreds of thousands, at the very least.The only thing that is going to determine the success, or failure of this site, is the readership numbers. Those numbers are going to be a direct result, in the long run, of the quality of the writing. ESPN and Bill Simmonds will get people to the site initially, but it's his team of writers that will keep them coming back. Ironically, the 3 reasons that the site will fail, According to this guy, (ESPN, Bill Simmonds, and his expensive writers), are actually the 3 reasons it will probably succeed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had already read that article before JJJ posted it, and the only thing it mentioned that I took notice of was that Simmons didn't want to name it Grandland. That made me sad.

Link to post
Share on other sites
If the site gets in the way of his podcasting, I'm against it.
Podcasting is going to be a major component of the site... so it won't.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading that Alec Baldwin article, it struck me how perfect David Foster Wallace would have been for this site. I can't help but think the foot notes ( side notes? end notes?) are directly influenced by him, and in general the intellectual pop cultural and sports commentary that the site is going for would have been perfect for DFW. I can't help but think he would have been a columnist for Grantland, had he lived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...