Jump to content

Random News Observations


Recommended Posts

News flash, the US has lots of guns, they like guns, they are gonna keep guns, people from other countries whining on a forum to some of our libs who hate our constitution isn't going to change that...carry on.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The most interesting thing about the worlds largest beaver dam is that it was discovered via Google Earth and some guy trekked out there to see it IRL and was the first person to ever set foot in that

Beware of overcharging someone. Thats the #1 lesson learned from the Zimmerman case. He was guilty of avoidable behavior that ultimately culminated in a fatality- manslaughter- but he was not guilty

You should've tried to get on the jury and convince the rest that he was not guilty.

Posted Images

loogie, nobody is surprised by that.

 

in unrelated news - the fake media continues to ignore the sinking ship that is the democrats Russia investigation. By the time that is all said and done it may bet the poison pill for BHO and Hillary...wait till the left tries to spin Zetterberg and facebook as a conservative group! LOL go get'em guys we know you are lying if you are actually reporting things!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

umm, yeah, that's what Bob said

 

I said it better.

 

 

Yes, a suicidal person would have to unlock their hunting rifle from a locked case, then retrieve the ammo from a separate location, then somehow figure out how to shoot themselves in the head with their hunting rifle. Sure you can see how this might be a little different than a handgun in the bedside table or the hip holster, right?

 

Because everyone follows the laws right?

 

 

 

again, that's not how things work

 

 

By things you mean narratives that you need to justify your position?

 

Because I see a huge difference between a kid getting a gun and shooting his baby sister from a 20 year old gang banger who shoots someone for wearing the wrong colors from a

 

 

 

"well, our gun death rates aren't so bad when you consider how many friggin guns we have"

 

wow, that's a new one. good job?

 

Arguing that gun numbers = gun deaths is the argument made by the left not the right/

 

 

 

pro-gun people love using extremely isolated anecdotes as confirmation bias for their previously held beliefs while ignoring the actual data that overwhelmingly opposes them.

 

if you liked that story, would you believe that it was cold in New Hampshire on Tuesday? Global Warming is a hoax!

 

NRA has massive data of gun owners stopping crimes, google will show this.

 

I of course site the NRA so that you can ignore the data which comes from news sites since this will help and I'm a giver.

 

 

And man-made Global warming is a hoax. It's just getting harder to continue the lie which is why it's not being reported as much

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

And man-made Global warming is a hoax. It's just getting harder to continue the lie which is why it's not being reported as much

 

 

aaaaand this is what we are dealing with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

“The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for.”

 

Keep clutching at those straws

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump sets a high standard, but he probably does get too much attention. There are other conservatives out there that need more of the spotlight.

 

For example, American hero Bill O'Reilly. Some people are mad at God because their child died of cancer. O'Reilly is mad at God because he couldn't get away with continually sexually harassing women.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bill-o-apos-reilly-says-040248887.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm curious how the future lefties will deal with the global warming scam that will prove to be false, just like the global cooling scam on the 70s?

 

Will you hate science?

 

Blame Bush/Trump?

 

Pretend it's still happening but the government is hiding the details?

 

Declare you never really believed in it after all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OR...alternative scenario

 

Midterm elections go poorly for Republicans

 

BG doubles down on Trump being reelected and global warming being a hoax.

 

Trump loses.

 

The Russian troll farm where Scuuda works shuts down.

 

BGs trolling is reduced to Clinton corruption posts and something about science being a hoax.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh, the age old battle of Science versus conservative ideas.

 

BG, you claim to be well versed in history. Tell me, how has that worked out over the course of human history?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how you can pit science vs conservative ideas.

 

You'll have to give an example because a philosophy of political ideals doesn't quantify well against the Pythagoras Theorem

 

 

The global warming hoax though is a money grab / socialist invention used to accumulate money/power and control.

 

Not the science that there is a warming trend, but the 'science' that Co2 from cars and factories are causing the eath to die in the next 10 50 500 years. This is evidenced by the forged data, corrupt selection of models and failure to use actual science instead of 'conclusion first, facts will be fit in later science'

Link to post
Share on other sites

OR...alternative scenario

 

Midterm elections go poorly for Republicans

 

BG doubles down on Trump being reelected and global warming being a hoax.

 

Trump loses.

 

The Russian troll farm where Scuuda works shuts down.

 

BGs trolling is reduced to Clinton corruption posts and something about science being a hoax.

 

Thought you all were going to wait till Nov 8th for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The global warming hoax though is a money grab / socialist invention used to accumulate money/power and control.

 

Denying global warming is a money grab / fossil fuel industry invention used to accumulate money/power and control.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a nice slow Saturday morning this weekend...can't help but notice the Clinton Security teams aka the fake news are in a full lather! God I love when the delusional get upset. It is staggering the length they will go to cover up! It is amazing they can continue to broadcast this as truth in reporting - wait oh yea they gave that up long ago. Carry on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a nice slow Saturday morning this weekend...can't help but notice the Clinton Security teams aka the fake news are in a full lather! God I love when the delusional get upset. It is staggering the length they will go to cover up! It is amazing they can continue to broadcast this as truth in reporting - wait oh yea they gave that up long ago. Carry on.

 

I know you don't believe in facts but posting this for others about Uranium One and the reality.

 

And yes we know that some shareholders in the Canadian company gave a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation but that is meaningless since you know Sec Clinton had only a very minor part in the US not having a problem with the shares of a Canadian mining conglomorate that happened to have as a small part of it's company some relatively small US uranium mines.

 

Opinion: Trump spreads more fake news on Hillary’s ‘uranium deal’

 

 

The U.S. is a bit player in the worldwide market for the radioactive metal.

 

President Trump, there’s a very good reason Congress isn’t investigating Hillary Clinton’s “big uranium deal” with Russia.

 

It’s because the story is absolute crap — as you well know.

 

• No, Hillary Clinton didn’t “sell America’s uranium.” She didn’t own it, or control it, and never had. This entire accusation is a farce.

 

In 2010 the stockholders of a Canadian mining company, Uranium One, accepted a bid from the Russian nuclear-energy agency, Rosatom, for a majority of their shares. They cashed out.

 

 

Uranium One was a worldwide producer. Among its assets were some U.S. uranium mines.

 

The decision was taken by pension-fund managers, other institutional investors and private investors from Canada, the U.S., Europe and elsewhere.

 

The deal had previously been approved by company management and independent directors on the board.

 

This is what’s known as “private property,” “commerce” and “capitalism.” Trump should read up on it.

 

The burden of proof for a U.S. government official to intervene in a Canadian stock-market transaction would have to be pretty high.

 

• No, Hillary didn’t “approve” the sale, either. She was just one of 14 — count ’em, 14 — people who sat on a U.S. government committee that might, in theory, have intervened but didn’t.

 

The others on the committee included the secretaries of the Treasury, homeland security, energy and defense; the White House budget director; the attorney general; and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

 

So, as far as we know, none of them said peep.

 

The committee could have intervened if it thought the deal threatened U.S. national security.

 

Others who could also have intervened in the deal, but saw no reason to, included the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and regulators in Canada and elsewhere.

 

• There is a very good reason none of those people or organizations tried to halt the deal. It wasn’t controversial. And if it weren’t for Trump’s cynical demagoguery, it wouldn’t be now.

 

America is a bit player in worldwide uranium production, and the amount involved was about half a percent — yes, really — of global supply.

 

Furthermore, uranium has been a drag on the international markets for years. There’s too much of it around. Miners are giving it away for less than it costs to dig up. There was no reason to think of it as an especially precious resource.

 

In 2010, when Russia agreed to this deal, the price of uranium had already fallen by 75% in three years. And since then it’s halved again. (But uranium prices have perked up a bit since Trump’s election. Long-suffering investors are hoping he’ll approve more nuclear reactors and buy lots more warheads. It’s another reason Vladimir Putin has reason to be so pleased with his protégé.)

 

• Finally, it’s worth remembering that this entire “story” was whipped up like a meringue by Peter Schweizer, a far-right hack at Breitbart. And, like a meringue, it’s almost all air.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a nice slow Saturday morning this weekend...can't help but notice the Clinton Security teams aka the fake news are in a full lather! God I love when the delusional get upset. It is staggering the length they will go to cover up! It is amazing they can continue to broadcast this as truth in reporting - wait oh yea they gave that up long ago. Carry on.

 

What a coincidence that on the week the first Grand Jury indictments have come down (all sealed so can't comment) that anti-Hillary smears have gone to Defcon 2?

 

As the right would say: Trump won the election, move on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Denying global warming is a money grab / fossil fuel industry invention used to accumulate money/power and control.

 

Don;t know if you are aware, but the petroleum industry is already super rich and pretty much in power.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CNN will be retweeting this shortly Bob!

 

if you cut both ways with your knife l may be inclined to listen.

 

No too much info for a tweet, instead they did a story

 

So while a full on investigation on racketeering was being investigated by the Obama justice department, the committee that approved the sale was not informed of the investigation,

 

The investigation was about the wide scale bribery and foreign agents actively involved in making this deal go through.

 

Spies were deported over this.

 

And the committee was denied any information about the investgation.

 

While the Clinton foundation received north of $140million.

 

 

 

No imagine if Trump had been involved, do you think this would give cry for impeachment by the left?

 

Receiving $140million, then not blocking the sale at least until the investigation was concluded?

 

 

Obama must be so sad that Hillary as going to destroy anything remotely close to a positive legacy he might have had.

He's destined to be a footnote because he didn't have the balls to tell Clinton she lost and to go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...