Jump to content

SavagePenguin

Members
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About SavagePenguin

  • Rank
    Poker Forum Newbie
  • Birthday 11/26/1973

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Poker Game
    NL Hold'em 6-max ring

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://savagepenguin.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    KY
  1. Salty leather.When I was twelve or so an Australian friend of mine tricked me into trying it.I remember it tasting like salty leather.
  2. I only have the pics to go by, but I didn't think there was any literal homosexuality to it.I figured it was a "giving grief to your friends in the name of bonding" thing rather than something malicious or sexual.
  3. DN didn't see it coming.And now for some more of the inevitable...
  4. It's my understanding that the second his cards touched the muck they were dead. So even if the dealer reveals that the hand would have been a winner, it's not.
  5. Thanks. Then I did the right thing.What if I didn't know the guy who had A/A, but thought that (due to position and player style) that it was to my advantage to shift chip stacks? It's still improper, right?I should shut up and give away zero information unless I'm active in the pot and trying to manipulate things towards my personal advantage.
  6. I have an ethics question of my own.Last month I carpooled to a tournament with an acquaintance of my wife. I'd only met the guy a couple times before, and on the drive he told me that he played really tight. Also, he's the one who drove.We ended up being seated at the same table, and he was indeed playing super-tight.One hand he made a big bet, out of position, and his hand was shaking like wet poodle when he meekly put the chips in. To me it was the most obvious thing in the world that this guy had A/A.I bailed out of the hand but a few people called.The flop is something like 9/4/2 rainb
  7. Based on what DN said, this is how I interpreted the event:Player X got 10 strokes from player E whenever they'd play.Player X lost about $220k to the player's Y & Z.Player X paid player's Y & Z the $220k.Player X worked on his game, but never played player E with a decreased handicap.When asked, player X stated that he was still getting 10 shots from player E.Player X played 18 holes, beating them.That same day player X beat Y & Z after going another 18 holes. (All parties had agreed to up the stakes)The next day, player X beat Y & Z after going another 18 holes. (All partie
×
×
  • Create New...