Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey people, I don't know if this area of the forum is still hopping or what, but help me out if you want.I'm writing an essay on Bush's legacy. Now, I'm not one of those people that asks people to do their work for them. Believe me, I will spend many hours researching this topic using credible, published books and will not be basing my academic paper on the rants of posters on an online poker forum.That being said, I'd be interested to get some opinions from people who are interested in politics, since it might help my own thought process along.So the question is: "What will be the historical legacy of the Bush 43 administration?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My thinking so far:Obviously my answer will mainly be related to the Iraq war and counter-terrorism stuff. I also need to cover domestic policy, and will certainly include the response to Katrina, and increased spending on education (NCLB etc). I don't know if 9/11 counts as foreign or domestic so I'll be asking my teacher that.I'd like to hear viewpoints from different perspectives. The questions I'm keeping in mind are:- What will Bush be remembered for? - Which of his policies will prove to have a deep and lasting impact on American politics? - Has he changed the style/power of the Executive in the long term, e.g. by expanding "inherent powers"?- Will public opinion of him improve with time (for instance, as Reagan's has)? Or even sink lower?

Link to post
Share on other sites
My thinking so far:Obviously my answer will mainly be related to the Iraq war and counter-terrorism stuff. I also need to cover domestic policy, and will certainly include the response to Katrina, and increased spending on education (NCLB etc). I don't know if 9/11 counts as foreign or domestic so I'll be asking my teacher that.I'd like to hear viewpoints from different perspectives. The questions I'm keeping in mind are:
- What will Bush be remembered for?
9/11tax cutskatrinaIraq/afghanistanWMD's
- Which of his policies will prove to have a deep and lasting impact on American politics?
Patriot ActNCLB
- Has he changed the style/power of the Executive in the long term, e.g. by expanding "inherent powers"?
Yes, he took many liberties that previous presidents have not, and has probably set a precedent.
- Will public opinion of him improve with time (for instance, as Reagan's has)? Or even sink lower?
It will improve, primarily because it can only go one way.
Link to post
Share on other sites
9/11tax cutskatrinaIraq/afghanistanWMD'sPatriot ActNCLBYes, he took many liberties that previous presidents have not, and has probably set a precedent.It will improve, primarily because it can only go one way.
I was going to write a response that gave opinions on the direction of opinion on these things, but this is definitely the fairest response, and this is an excellent starting point.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I was going to write a response that gave opinions on the direction of opinion on these things, but this is definitely the fairest response, and this is an excellent starting point.
Opinions would be more helpful than a list of policies/events which I have already expressed my intention to include (see my second OP). Of course, the list is somewhat helpful in terms of prioritising and structuring, but I was hoping for more reasoning.I just wrote this in a sentence: "recent resurgence in Ronald Reagan’s reputation" - try saying that 5 times fast. I will probably end up changing it since it seems kinda unproffessional, but I wonder if my teacher would find it amusing. There's no way they deduct marks for alliteration, right?
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'll give it a quick shot:

9/11tax cutskatrinaIraq/afghanistanWMD'sPatriot ActNCLBYes, he took many liberties that previous presidents have not, and has probably set a precedent.It will improve, primarily because it can only go one way.
9/11 -- He will be remembered for handling it with strength and dignity, and saying the right things. After that, he will be remembered for declaring war on the wrong country and getting us involved in an endless quagmire.Katrina -- I don't think this will matter for long, at least not in terms of Bush's legacy. Obama has been worse on a couple issues, he just didn't get the negative press. In the end, it will be remembered as bureaucratic ineptitude, not Bush's.Iran/Afghanistan -- see above. Wrong war, wrong time, handled poorly.WMDs -- see Iran/Afghanistan. They didn't exist, never did, and it was obvious at the time to most people.PATRIOT Act -- hopefully this will be remembered as a dark moment in American history, like the Trail of Tears or the interrment of Japanese during WWII. I'm hoping people will wonder how people could be so stupid as to give up so much freedom for a symbolic gesture of protection.NCLB -- I'm not sure people will care about this much in a decade or two. Hopefully it will be repealed quickly before it does much more damage, and it will be considered a minor blip on American history. If it's not repealed, or worse, expanded, he will eventually be blamed for a lot of bad educations.I would add the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit to the list, I guess, which will be remembered for speeding up the eventual bankruptcy of the Medicare program, which will eventually force it to be completely revised.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The tax cuts, next to his response to 9/11 is probably the best thing he did as president.
if you mean his immediate response, ok. The more important, ultimate response went poorly.Considering the skyrocketing deficits Bush rang up, I doubt he will be given a lot of credit for the success of his tax cuts.
Link to post
Share on other sites
if you mean his immediate response, ok. The more important, ultimate response went poorly.Considering the skyrocketing deficits Bush rang up, I doubt he will be given a lot of credit for the success of his tax cuts.
We don't see things the same on that issue, for some reason you enjoy paying taxes.
Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, I'll give it a quick shot:9/11 -- He will be remembered for handling it with strength and dignity, and saying the right things. After that, he will be remembered for declaring war on the wrong country and getting us involved in an endless quagmire.Katrina -- I don't think this will matter for long, at least not in terms of Bush's legacy. Obama has been worse on a couple issues, he just didn't get the negative press. In the end, it will be remembered as bureaucratic ineptitude, not Bush's.Iran/Afghanistan -- see above. Wrong war, wrong time, handled poorly.WMDs -- see Iran/Afghanistan. They didn't exist, never did, and it was obvious at the time to most people.PATRIOT Act -- hopefully this will be remembered as a dark moment in American history, like the Trail of Tears or the interrment of Japanese during WWII. I'm hoping people will wonder how people could be so stupid as to give up so much freedom for a symbolic gesture of protection.NCLB -- I'm not sure people will care about this much in a decade or two. Hopefully it will be repealed quickly before it does much more damage, and it will be considered a minor blip on American history. If it's not repealed, or worse, expanded, he will eventually be blamed for a lot of bad educations.I would add the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit to the list, I guess, which will be remembered for speeding up the eventual bankruptcy of the Medicare program, which will eventually force it to be completely revised.
That's more like it!I don't consider WMDs a factor on their own, but only as an aspect of the Iraq war and perhaps Afghanistan (I don't know much about the deets of these wars yet, need to do some targeted research). I think NCLB and the prescription stuff are also significant in a broader sense in that it is unusual for a Republican to pursue increased spending and intervention in health and education, and also for the way they contributed to the overall growth in bureaucracy and increased deficit during the Bush admin. What do you guys think about the circumstances of his original election i.e. allegations of rigging and fraud etc? Will that be viewed more harshly in the future, or do you think people will forget it? I don't know if it's worth including, which is why I ask.
Link to post
Share on other sites
What do you guys think about the circumstances of his original election i.e. allegations of rigging and fraud etc? Will that be viewed more harshly in the future, or do you think people will forget it? I don't know if it's worth including, which is why I ask.
I don't think people Blame bush for that. The sloppiness of the voting process is what left us open to all the wrangling by the political parties in the election endgame. I think the legacy of that whole situation is mistrust in vote counting, and hopefully voting reform, but I don't think any of that is held against Bush.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think people Blame bush for that. The sloppiness of the voting process is what left us open to all the wrangling by the political parties in the election endgame. I think the legacy of that whole situation is mistrust in vote counting, and hopefully voting reform, but I don't think any of that is held against Bush.
Good point, thanks for that. I guess I assumed he might be regarded as kind of an "accidental president", especially considering he had the lower popular vote (according to my memory....) but the fact that our current PM is unelected is probably confusing my thoughts on the matter. I don't think I will discuss his election, based on your insight.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Good point, thanks for that. I guess I assumed he might be regarded as kind of an "accidental president", especially considering he had the lower popular vote (according to my memory....) but the fact that our current PM is unelected is probably confusing my thoughts on the matter. I don't think I will discuss his election, based on your insight.
I think the voting counts just perpetuated a distrust in the political system. You had the Democrats whom wanted to disqualify a bunch of ballots because of "hanging chads" those little paper cut outs, and they also tried to stop getting about 30K (IIRC) over seas military votes counted because they got here late, but they were sent in before the election was over.
Link to post
Share on other sites
We don't see things the same on that issue, for some reason you enjoy paying taxes.
Not half as much as you old people like hanging debt on us youngins with your tax cuts at war time (or to be fair your unrealistic health care plans).
Link to post
Share on other sites
My thinking so far:Obviously my answer will mainly be related to the Iraq war and counter-terrorism stuff. I also need to cover domestic policy, and will certainly include the response to Katrina, and increased spending on education (NCLB etc). I don't know if 9/11 counts as foreign or domestic so I'll be asking my teacher that.I'd like to hear viewpoints from different perspectives. The questions I'm keeping in mind are:- What will Bush be remembered for? - Which of his policies will prove to have a deep and lasting impact on American politics? - Has he changed the style/power of the Executive in the long term, e.g. by expanding "inherent powers"?- Will public opinion of him improve with time (for instance, as Reagan's has)? Or even sink lower?
For Republicans, he will be remembered as VITAL in history because of two things:John RobertsSamuel AlitoNothing else matters even a little bit... That being said, many Republicans are very disappointed with his 8 years overall, especially 2004-2006 when he controlled congress as well and they didn't cut spending.Republicans are for smaller federal government, and Bush 43 did the opposite of that.
Link to post
Share on other sites
The tax cuts, next to his response to 9/11 is probably the best thing he did as president.
Are you nuts? SUPREME COURT... and it's not close.The Supreme Court is basically the definition of legacy. Those guys won't retire for 30-40 years.
if you mean his immediate response, ok. The more important, ultimate response went poorly.Considering the skyrocketing deficits Bush rang up, I doubt he will be given a lot of credit for the success of his tax cuts.
hahaha... oh Canebrain. Good one. He worst annual deficit was 490 billion. Obama is going to quadruple that this year. 2009's was 1.6 trillion.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you nuts? SUPREME COURT... and it's not close.The Supreme Court is basically the definition of legacy. Those guys won't retire for 30-40 years.
Mehhh, I'm not sure SC appointments really count. I mean they are basically randomly given to presidents when someone retires. If you like what Alito and Roberts do, that is their own legacy, not Bush's.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mehhh, I'm not sure SC appointments really count. I mean they are basically randomly given to presidents when someone retires. If you like what Alito and Roberts do, that is their own legacy, not Bush's.
I totally disagree. Do you think I blame Bush #1 for David Souter, or do I blame David Souter for being himself?Hint: I don't blame David Souter.In fact, I believe that HW's legacy is tied to that monumental screw-up.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Mehhh, I'm not sure SC appointments really count. I mean they are basically randomly given to presidents when someone retires. If you like what Alito and Roberts do, that is their own legacy, not Bush's.
Agree with this. While the impact of SCOTUS decisions matters a great deal to history, we don't really associate them with the presidents who nominated them, especially not in the long run. Example: we remember the decisions of the Earl Warren court, like Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona, as wildly liberal. Virtually no one, though, connects those decisions with Eisenhower, the president who nominated Warren (or remembers that Warren was a Republican).It is worth noting that "historical legacy" has always been defined by the academy, and professors lean left. It's almost always professional historians who get the last word, via biography and authorship of influential history books. Unless academia suddenly takes a shift to the right, I wouldn't expect Bush's legacy to improve much at all.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_ra...e_United_StatesHere's a link to how (and by whom) presidents are ranked. It should be very useful for your research, as it explains how the rankings came to exist, who carries them out, and some of the reasoning used for them.
Link to post
Share on other sites
I totally disagree. Do you think I blame Bush #1 for David Souter, or do I blame David Souter for being himself?Hint: I don't blame David Souter.In fact, I believe that HW's legacy is tied to that monumental screw-up.
So, if we judge by you, this is his legacy.If we judge by any other criteria, this is fairly minor. I have never heard anyone, but you, get really riled up over David Souter. HW's legacy is a desert war, losing to a very popular guy while running for re-election, and fathering a son who grew up to be a horrible president.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think brv is answering the question, "What did Bush do that will have the most lasting effects?" while everyone else is answering, "What will Bush most be remembered for?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
So, if we judge by you, this is his legacy.If we judge by any other criteria, this is fairly minor. I have never heard anyone, but you, get really riled up over David Souter. HW's legacy is a desert war, losing to a very popular guy while running for re-election, and fathering a son who grew up to be a horrible president.
Then you must not hang out extensively with Republicans talking about Bush #1... also you must not listen to Rush.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...