Wild Card

[Balloon guy 158]

I think it should be by height.

[fleung22 1]

I think using division record is stupid for the wildcard tiebreaker. It punishes teams who have tougher division opponents.Wildcard should beHead to headConference RecordCommon Opponents1 Game Playoff

Agreed. Why does division record come into play for wild card spots? Versus conference makes so much more sense.

[gilbertology 0]

I think using division record is stupid for the wildcard tiebreaker. It punishes teams who have tougher division opponents.Wildcard should beHead to headConference RecordCommon Opponents1 Game Playoff

Although I plan to win the division, I agree with Zimmer here. With that said, I doubt sleuthis will change the rules once they've been set.

[checkymcfold 0]

for the record, i agree with zim as well, and even though it screws us in saying so, i do think it'd be wrong to change things after the rules were set from the beginning.

[pipes123 0]

Yeah the puggy pearson division is a tough go of it for sure. Each team is tough that is for sure. Our division has an overall record of 24-17. But the Spades confernce in general is super tough. We have 7 teams 6-4 or higher and maybe 8 by the end of tonight.

[Theraflu 1,035]

where can i find a picture of a violin...

[The Czar 0]

I think it should be by height.

I agree. This seems to be the least time consuming and the least confusing. I'll start. I'm 6'5.

[looshle 6]

If everybody just pwned then we wouldnt have to worry about the wildcard procedure now would we?

[Balloon guy 158]

I agree. This seems to be the least time consuming and the least confusing. I'll start. I'm 6'5.

finally, some common sense on the forum.I'm 6'5" as well, so I guess that plan failed.Longest drive?

[fleung22 1]

for the record, i agree with zim as well, and even though it screws us in saying so, i do think it'd be wrong to change things after the rules were set from the beginning.

Yeah, that's true. I'm such a stickler for rules that it would be wrong to change the tie breaker formula unless there was a unanimous decision.

[sleuthis 0]

Yeah, that's true. I'm such a stickler for rules that it would be wrong to change the tie breaker formula unless there was a unanimous decision.

Actually it wouldnt be changing the rules at all...........since nothing was laid out for 3+ teams being tied.However I will keep it as simple as possible.for multiple teams1) Head to head records2) CONFERENCE record3) Record vs common teams4) Total team weight (in lbs)5) one game playoff (unless more than 2 teams remain tied in which case it will be a round robin)and btw - #4 is a joke (in case any of you were running for a scale)

[Balloon guy 158]

4) Total team weight (in lbs)and btw - #4 is a joke (in case any of you were running for a scale)

I was running for a pizza. Okay, okay, another pizza

[troyomac 0]

I was running for a pizza. Okay, okay, another pizza

Don't run, call for delivery, you'll lose less pounds!

[fleung22 1]

and btw - #4 is a joke (in case any of you were running for a scale)

God dammit!! I just finished adding the Fossilman onto the Team Canada roster!!

[custom36 4]

I think it should be by height.

I agree with this one.

[Yoda 1]

Actually it wouldnt be changing the rules at all...........since nothing was laid out for 3+ teams being tied.However I will keep it as simple as possible.for multiple teams1) Head to head records2) CONFERENCE record3) Record vs common teams4) Total team weight (in lbs)5) one game playoff (unless more than 2 teams remain tied in which case it will be a round robin)and btw - #4 is a joke (in case any of you were running for a scale)

Good change, I was going to agree with the flock but it looks to be taken care of