Jump to content

A H L Discussion


Recommended Posts

I believe John still has nightmares of j6 off. Or looking down the table to see magicboy looking at me when he fish his gut shot on me

 

you were in leagues with Darrell before the AHL weren't you Wayne ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 20.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FCP Bob

    3208

  • Zach6668

    3141

  • digitalmonkey

    2812

  • serge

    2602

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

and sorry about not having everything up to date yet contract wise. I'll be working on that the next couple days and will have it all done hopefully before the weekend but if not over the weekend for

Unlike other predictions, these are meant to insult and offend both finalists.   #1 Eddie Shack Conference vs #1 Tiger Williams Conference   Steelheads (56-25-1) +/- 167 vs Big M (52-25-5) +/-

AHL GM's European Summit 2015 was a blast! Whalers really embraced the culture....     As per tradition of trades whenever owners cross paths... Whalers and Swackers have agreed to swap .25 both

Posted Images

 

 

you were in leagues with Darrell before the AHL weren't you Wayne ?

 

Yes the league broke off after a heated discussion. Darrell went off and started another one I stayed and than did not like the shenanigans going on and left. Darrell contacted me and I came back in

 

 

We use to go to don cherry in etobicoke on weekday game nights to watch and discuss

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

this seems to be a common theme with Darrell. :)

 

I am going to side with Darrell on the first break off. I actually don’t speak to anyone from the former pool anymore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whalers vs Big Ms in a big match-up tonight. I guess I'm mostly hoping for a no-OT/SO situation. Though a Bob win outright probably helps me the most.

 

It's a veritable coin flip though. My projections show:

 

Big Ms - 3.569

Whalers - 3.560

 

Not sure I've ever seen a matchup so close. Whalers with a big edge at F, Big Ms counter with a big advantage on D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, Stackers are facing the Ingmen, who are poised for an upset. Mark Stone's return seemingly got pushed back a game, so I'm dressing the likes of Sam Bennett and Drew Stafford (and en empty F slot). Somehow, I'm still looking at a 1.5 goal advantage. Feels like I'm primed for an upset, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whalers vs Big Ms in a big match-up tonight. I guess I'm mostly hoping for a no-OT/SO situation. Though a Bob win outright probably helps me the most.

 

It's a veritable coin flip though. My projections show:

 

Big Ms - 3.569

Whalers - 3.560

 

Not sure I've ever seen a matchup so close. Whalers with a big edge at F, Big Ms counter with a big advantage on D.

the game is played on ice, not paper, kid.

Sincerely,

Every non relevant hockey gm in the nhl.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

the game is played on ice, not paper, kid.

 

on paper, my 4th, 5th and 6th D all look like they COULD get points.

on the ice....well, they won't be on the ice, all hurt. Drop me down .200 or whatever Z man

Link to post
Share on other sites

on paper, my 4th, 5th and 6th D all look like they COULD get points.

on the ice....well, they won't be on the ice, all hurt. Drop me down .200 or whatever Z man

 

Damn.

 

This only took into account your lineup for today... so McCabe is the only one not playing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn.

This only took into account your lineup for today... so McCabe is the only one not playing?

 

of my 4 in lineup, yes.

 

also, took out Landeskog and put in Eberle. Playing a hunch. On paper, Landeskog is better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arp wins barring a 2-goal performance from Nate Schmidt. (And Arp still has Marchessault to counter.)

 

I think I win in a shootout if Hertl gets a goal. I think I would lose in a shootout if he gets 2 assists. 1.5 Hertl points in any matter, I win outright.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arp wins barring a 2-goal performance from Nate Schmidt. (And Arp still has Marchessault to counter.)

 

I think I win in a shootout if Hertl gets a goal. I think I would lose in a shootout if he gets 2 assists. 1.5 Hertl points in any matter, I win outright.

 

This is incorrect. I lose in SO in all cases. I need 1.5 to win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why we even bother to play the games...we should just ask Ortenzio who will win.

 

Text from him at 9 last night:

 

Btw, you are on your way to a 9.0

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why we even bother to play the games...we should just ask Ortenzio who will win.

 

Text from him at 9 last night:

 

Btw, you are on your way to a 9.0

 

It was a lucky guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me if you guys read this same way I do....

 

AHL Rules "1. Two division winners will each receive 1st round byes.

2. The non division winning team with the best record will be the #3 seed and play the #6 seed in round 1 with seeds #4 and #5 facing off in a best of seven series in round one.

3. The top seeded division winner will face off against the lowest seed available in round two , while the second highest seed will play the highest seeded team left"

 

With regards to point #3, in the 2nd round, the 2 division winners do NOT automatically get the #1 and #2 seeds. Correct?

The 4 remaining teams are ranked in order of standings pts, and 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me if you guys read this same way I do....

 

AHL Rules "1. Two division winners will each receive 1st round byes.

2. The non division winning team with the best record will be the #3 seed and play the #6 seed in round 1 with seeds #4 and #5 facing off in a best of seven series in round one.

3. The top seeded division winner will face off against the lowest seed available in round two , while the second highest seed will play the highest seeded team left"

 

With regards to point #3, in the 2nd round, the 2 division winners do NOT automatically get the #1 and #2 seeds. Correct?

The 4 remaining teams are ranked in order of standings pts, and 1 vs 4, 2 vs 3

 

I believe the teams are seeded #1 through to #6 right at the start of playoffs and keep that seed the whole way through. basically if you don't win your division, the #3 seed it the highest you can get even if you have more points then other division winner.

 

On a an interesting side note, the Gothic/Shootloose/Ravens presidents trophy race could see the presidents trophy winner NOT win their division and have to play first round. LOL

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On a an interesting side note, the Gothic/Shootloose/Ravens presidents trophy race could see the presidents trophy winner NOT win their division and have to play first round. LOL

 

My head hurts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...