Jump to content

Massachusetts Ballot Initiative


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (checkymcfold @ Thursday, June 3rd, 2010, 2:20 AM) *he got pulled over on the highway tripping balls. the officer asked him, "son, do you know how fast you were going?" and he replied, "about 75, probably. i'm sorry, officer."the officer then says, "FIVE. you were going FIVE miles per hour.
Isn't that a scene from Black Sheep?
if it is, my stoner college friend just lost the best story he ever told.
Motorcycle Cop: [Mike and Steve are borrowing their friend's souped up police cruiser. However, a harsh bump in the road broke the seal on the nitrous system and nitrous oxide has been leaking in to the car. They've just been pulled over] Tell me, officer, do you have any idea how fast you were going? Mike: Well, I got a 426 hemi here, 3/4 cams, nitro boosters, I can get 'er up to as good as 155! Never do, though, of course, unless I'm chasing a cute chick in a Ferrari! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I guess I was goin' about... 65, tops. Motorcycle Cop: SEVEN! SEVEN miles an hour! And normally, when I stop people, they pull onto the *shoulder*!
BG, how about that link for hblask?
The above demonstrates pretty well how drugs affect your ability to handle reality.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Every indication is that prohibition increases drug abuse. I have provided several examples of this. If you believe the opposite, provide one contrary example.
Link This is the main page, more stuff is in the links, and the sub links.
Like henry asked, can you provide even a single link to any site that agrees with your point of view? I don't understand how posting a link to narcotics anonymous? How does that refute henry or back up what you say?The internets is big, I would think there's a link somewhere.edit: using anecdotal evidence? That's pretty ridiculous even for you. Are you really too lazy to find a single source that agrees with you?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Like henry asked, can you provide even a single link to any site that agrees with your point of view? I don't understand how posting a link to narcotics anonymous? How does that refute henry or back up what you say?The internets is big, I would think there's a link somewhere.edit: using anecdotal evidence? That's pretty ridiculous even for you. Are you really too lazy to find a single source that agrees with you?
Yes.You take this internet thing way too serious.Plus when you're right as often as me, it's kind of boring to search for other people who agree with you.It's on you guys to try to prove me wrong.so far, nothing has even come close
Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes.You take this internet thing way too serious.Plus when you're right as often as me, it's kind of boring to search for other people who agree with you.It's on you guys to try to prove me wrong.so far, nothing has even come close
That's a hilariously trollish attitude to have, I'm glad that you aren't really like this.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Calling being worried about the effects of unrestricted access to heroin, crack, meth and lsd irrational..isn't very rational
If all supporting data show that worst case is no change, then it is irrational to be worried about it. You can't keep repeating your irrational fears and suddenly expect us to say, oh yeah, now I'm afraid, too. I know, I know, that how politics works, but I would like to think this forum has a higher standard of thought. Show some data to make us believe.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...